Cohen’s Misconception of Google’s Bard AI Tool
In a striking turn of events, it was revealed yesterday that Michael Cohen, the one-time attorney for ex-president Donald Trump, has been exploiting Google’s Bard AI to produce sham legal documents. According to a federal court filing, the intended purpose was to expedite the termination of his supervised release.
Cohen is known to have used Google’s Bard AI to generate three bogus decisions. However, David Perry, the attorney representing Michael Cohen, clarified in the court that her client wrongly viewed Google Bard as a supercharged search engine instead of a Chat GPT-like artificial intelligence tool.
Key Takeaways:
– Michael Cohen, former attorney for Donald Trump, used Google’s Bard AI to create false legal filings.
– The filings were aimed to end Cohen’s court-ordered monitored release.
– Cohen is on supervised release after serving half of a three-year sentence for arranging hush money payments to Stormy Daniels during the 2016 presidential campaign.
– Cohen’s lawyer, Danya Perry, admitted to the use of AI in federal court filings, stating that Cohen believed Google Bard was a research tool rather than an AI.
Journey of Michael Cohen
To provide context, Cohen is receiving supervision after serving half of a three-year sentence. The courts found him guilty in 2018. His crime was arranging secret payoff payments to adult film actress Stormy Daniels during Trump’s presidential campaign in 2016.
Misunderstanding or Misuse?
Cohen’s perplexing use of Google’s Bard AI propels us toward an essential question: Was this a case of misunderstanding or misuse? It’s noteworthy to establish the capabilities of Google’s AI tool, Bard. While some consider it a suped-up search engine, which isn’t entirely false, it’s much more. In reality, Bard is a prominent AI tool, similar to Conversational AI platforms such as Chat GPT.
Mistakenly or otherwise, it seems Cohen used this tool to fabricate a series of legal decisions. A grave action, particularly at a time when he is already serving a supervised release over his prior involvement in arranging illicit payments during a critical political campaign.
Legal Repercussions
The misuse of Google’s Bard AI for generating bogus legal filings can carry severe legal consequences. This incident is not only a potential violation of his terms of release but could also result in fresh charges being levied against Cohen.
The broader implications of Cohen’s actions cast a glaring light on the potential misuse of AI tools in legal matters. The question remains whether more stringent regulations are needed to prevent such potential misuse in the future.
Cohen’s plight serves as a stark reminder of the uncharted territories we’re entering with the growth of AI. The gravity of his actions and their potential consequences emphasize the need for clearer understanding and increased responsibility when dealing with AI and legal matters. As we tread this new ground, it becomes ever more evident that the judicious use of technology and AI is not just a matter of protocol. It’s a question of ethics, legality, and ultimately, human responsibility.
In conclusion, whether it was a mere misunderstanding on Cohen’s part regarding Google’s Bard AI or a calculated misuse, it highlights significant issues. The incident underscores the potential for manipulation within our legal system using advanced technology. It emphasizes the need for the law and technology sectors to work closely, ensuring adequate safeguarding against potential misuses of such powerful tools.