Key Takeaways:
- DOJ attorneys have fewer high-profile cases, leaving them with surplus capacity.
- The 6.3 million unexpected votes for Joe Biden in 2020 warrant scrutiny.
- Mail-in voting increases fraud risk, and anomalies in 2020 need attention.
- The DOJ has ample resources to tackle such investigations.
DOJ’s Idle Capacity Presents Opportunity
The U.S. Department of Justice, while having over 10,000 attorneys, has seen several high-profile cases dismissed, leaving many lawyers with less critical work. This provides an opportunity to redirect resources to significant issues, such as investigating the unexpected vote surge in the 2020 election.
The 2020 Election Anomaly
Joe Biden received a surprising 6.3 million more votes in 2020 compared to Hillary Clinton in 2016, a 23% increase that raises eyebrows. In contrast, Trump’s votes increased by a more modest 4%. This discrepancy, especially in a year with unprecedented mail-in voting, calls for a closer look by the DOJ.
Mail-In Vulnerabilities and Possible Fraud
The 2020 election saw expanded mail-in voting due to COVID, which, while convenient, also introduced higher fraud risks. While some attribute the vote spike to increased accessibility, the scale suggests deeper issues that warrant investigation to ensure election integrity.
Potential Explanations and Concerns
Proponents argue that relaxed voting rules could explain increased turnout, yet such a massive spike without other contributing factors seems improbable. This uncertainty underscores the need for an impartial investigation to clarify whether fraud occurred.
Elon Musk’s Insights on Election Integrity
Elon Musk noted unexplained anomalies in the 2020 election, supporting the need for scrutiny. His team’s detection of improbable voter records, such as 160-year-old voters, points to potential železité ballistic_ACTIVITY that necessitates further inquiry.
DOJ’s Role in Addressing Double Standards
The ongoing prosecution of Republicans who questioned the 2020 results highlights a perceived imbalance. The DOJ’s intervention could ensure fair treatment and transparency, crucial for public trust in electoral processes.
Conclusion: Ensuring Future Election Integrity
The DOJ’s resources and current capacity make it an ideal agency to investigate the 2020 vote spike, ensuring that such unexplained discrepancies do not recur. Addressing these issues is vital for maintaining the integrity and trustworthiness of future elections.