Key Takeaways:
- Law professor Deborah Pearlstein criticizes Big Law firms for not standing up against Trump’s actions.
- Big Law firms have the power but remain silent, potentially undermining the legal system.
- Examples of firms like Covington & Burling and Perkins Coie show their cautious responses.
- Solidarity among firms is crucial to protect the legal system and democracy.
Introduction
Deborah Pearlstein, a law professor, is calling out top law firms for their silence in the face of Trump’s attacks on the legal system. These firms, known as Big Law, have the power and influence to make a difference but are choosing to stay quiet. Pearlstein argues that their inaction could have serious consequences for the rule of law and democracy.
The Role and Silence of Big Law
Big Law firms are crucial in upholding the legal system and economy. Despite their influence, they are not using their power to challenge Trump’s actions. Pearlstein points out that while individual judges and lawyers are pushing back, big firms are avoiding confrontation. This silence is seen as cowardice by Pearlstein, who believes they should be leading the charge against Trump’s tactics.
Examples of Inaction
Several firms have faced direct retaliation from Trump but have not spoken out. Covington & Burling, which worked with a special counsel investigating Trump, saw their lawyers’ security clearances revoked. Yet, the firm remained silent. Similarly, Perkins Coie, which represented Hillary Clinton, lost federal contracts and access but also stayed quiet. Most strikingly, Paul, Weiss struck a deal with Trump, contributing to his causes, reportedly due to client concerns and competition from other firms.
A Call to Action
Pearlstein emphasizes that Big Law must act collectively. Individual efforts are not enough; solidarity is key. By standing together, these firms can show their commitment to the law and protect the legal system. This solidarity is not just for law firms but also for their clients and the broader democracy.
The Bigger Picture
The silence of Big Law reflects a broader issue where powerful institutions hesitate to challenge authority. This reluctance can weaken the legal system and democracy. Pearlstein urges these firms to remember their obligations to the law and their clients, rather than just avoiding conflict.
Conclusion
Pearlstein’s criticism highlights the critical role of Big Law in defending the legal system. Their silence could have long-term consequences. By standing together, these firms can uphold the law and set an example for others. The time to act is now, to ensure that the rule of law and democracy prevail.