Key Takeaways:
- Former GOP Rep. Patrick McHenry slammed the idea of giving Ashli Babbitt a military funeral.
- A full military funeral features Taps, a flag presentation, and an honor guard.
- Critics say Babbitt’s actions on January 6 do not deserve military honors.
- Babbitt’s family may receive a military funeral after a $5 million settlement.
Former Congressman Patrick McHenry called out President Trump’s plan to award Ashli Babbitt a military funeral. Babbitt was shot and killed inside the Capitol during the January 6 riot. Trump wants to honor her with the highest service tribute. Yet McHenry said this is undeserved.
McHenry spoke with CNN’s Kasie Hunt on “The Arena.” He said full military honors go to those who died defending the nation. He added that Babbitt’s act was cowardly, not brave. Therefore, she should not get military honors.
Why Is the Military Funeral Plan Controversial?
This plan stirred strong reactions because of Babbitt’s role on January 6. She tried to climb through a broken window to enter the Speaker’s Lobby. Lawmakers had locked themselves inside as the riot continued. Security officers aimed to stop her and protect the building.
Critics note that full military funeral honors recognize service members who die in combat or defense. They say Babbitt’s actions do not meet that standard. Instead, they view her attempt to force entry as an attack on democracy.
What Does a Military Funeral Include?
A full military funeral follows strict customs. First, a flag drapes the casket. Second, a detail of uniformed military personnel stands watch. Third, the ceremony ends with the bugler playing “Taps.” Finally, a flag-folding ceremony takes place, and the family receives the flag.
These honors carry deep meaning. They honor sacrifice made for the nation. Military tradition reserves them for service members killed in action or while serving honorably.
Why Supporters Want a Military Funeral
Supporters argue Babbitt served in the Air Force. They say she deserves the same respect as any other veteran. Judicial Watch, a right-wing group, has pressed for this honor for months. Trump’s informal legal adviser Tom Fitton heads that group.
Moreover, supporters see Babbitt as a martyr for free speech and political protest. They believe the government overstepped by denying her a military funeral after she died. Last August, the Air Force under Secretary Matthew Lohmeier said it would reverse a Biden-era decision to deny her military funeral rights.
Why Opponents Reject the Plan
Opponents point out that a military funeral is not a reward for political causes. They insist it is a solemn rite for those who defend the country. McHenry calls Babbitt’s actions an “act of cowardice.” He argues she attacked her own government.
Many view January 6 as an insurrection. They feel honoring one of its rioters sends a harmful message. It could suggest that violence against lawmakers can be rewarded with state honors.
The $5 Million Settlement
Just months ago, the federal government paid Babbitt’s family a $5 million settlement. The payment recognized wrongful death after a lengthy legal fight. However, that settlement did not include a guarantee of funeral honors.
Now Trump’s plan to add a military funeral stirs fresh debate. Some see it as political theater. Others view it as a sincere attempt to honor a veteran.
What Comes Next?
The Department of the Air Force has signaled it will grant the funeral. That move will follow standard military funeral procedures. Yet political opposition may still arise. Congressional leaders could push back or seek to block official funding.
In addition, public opinion may influence the final decision. As news outlets cover this story, public pressure could shape how the military proceeds. Families of other veterans may raise concerns if they see this as setting a new precedent.
Balancing Honor and Accountability
This debate raises a key question: How do we honor veterans while upholding accountability? Full military honors symbolize the nation’s highest respect. Yet critics argue we cannot blur the line between service and insurrection.
In many ways, this controversy reflects a divided America. One side wants to honor any veteran who dies in uniform. The other side demands strict adherence to tradition and purpose. Ultimately, the decision will test how traditions adapt to modern political battles.
Conclusion
The plan to give Ashli Babbitt a military funeral remains deeply divisive. Supporters cite her Air Force service and veteran status. Opponents say her January 6 actions disqualify her from military honors. As this story unfolds, the nation will watch closely. It will reveal not only how we honor the fallen, but also how we define true service and sacrifice.
Frequently Asked Questions
What qualifies someone for a military funeral?
Full military funerals honor service members who die in combat or while serving faithfully. The ceremony includes a flag drape, honor guard, Taps, and flag folding.
Can a family challenge a funeral honor decision?
Yes. Families can appeal to the branch’s senior leadership. They can present evidence of honorable service or ask for an exception.
Did Ashli Babbitt serve honorably in the military?
Babbitt was an Air Force veteran. She completed her term of enlistment without public record of dishonorable discharge.
Could granting this honor change military tradition?
Some worry it could. They fear it may blur the line between official military service honors and political gestures.
How do other veterans feel about this decision?
Reactions vary. Some veterans support any tribute to a fellow service member. Others worry it undermines the meaning of military honors.