Key Takeaways

• Erin Burnett revealed Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth once warned against illegal orders.
• In 2016, Hegseth said troops must refuse unlawful commands.
• Today, he claims service members must obey any order.
• CNN’s video evidence highlights this stark reversal.
• Debate over strikes in international waters fuels the controversy.

Erin Burnett’s fact check

CNN host Erin Burnett played a clip on her show showing Pete Hegseth’s past words about illegal orders. She noted how sharply his view has changed. In the video, Hegseth warned that troops who follow unlawful commands face consequences. Yet now, as defense secretary, he urges soldiers to obey orders regardless of legality.

Hegseth’s 2016 stance on illegal orders

Back in 2016, Hegseth spoke clearly. He said the military must refuse illegal orders. He explained that war crimes bring punishment. He even pointed out that the U.S. military itself would not follow unlawful commands from its commander in chief. This statement aligns with long-standing laws that protect service members who say “no” to criminal orders.

His recent claims on military orders

However, in recent weeks, Hegseth has taken a different line. He told troops they must follow orders “no matter what.” He argued that breaking ranks could threaten discipline and mission success. This sudden pivot surprised many veterans and legal experts. After all, military law has always held that illegal orders must be rejected.

Why illegal orders matter now

The debate comes amid strikes on suspected drug vessels in international waters. The administration has launched over twenty strikes. Nearly one hundred people have died. Yet officials have shown little proof those boats posed a real threat. Critics worry that tight rules on illegal orders could force troops into questionable actions.

Experts and veterans weigh in

Moreover, several military veterans who serve in Congress released a video this month. In it, they remind service members that illegal orders breach both U.S. law and international rules. They urge troops to know their rights. They also underline that refusing criminal commands protects the nation’s honor.

Trump’s reaction and Hegseth’s threat

Meanwhile, former President Trump slammed the veterans’ video as “seditious behavior.” He and Hegseth warned those lawmakers they could face court-martial. This move shocked many observers. It seems to punish elected leaders for offering lawful advice to troops about illegal orders. As a result, the issue now spans politics, military ethics, and individual conscience.

Impact on ongoing strikes

The current strikes in international waters intensify the question of illegal orders. Are troops expected to fire on vessels without clear proof of threat? If so, could they be forced to follow orders that violate the law? These concerns grow as strikes continue without transparent evidence. Therefore, the public and lawmakers demand better explanations and stronger checks.

What this means for service members

Service members face a tough spot. Discipline and order remain vital in the armed forces. Yet soldiers also take an oath to uphold the Constitution. They must not commit war crimes or break international law. If they do, they risk criminal charges. Thus, clarity on illegal orders matters now more than ever.

Next steps in the debate

Lawmakers may hold hearings to examine military rules and the legal guidance given to troops. Veterans groups plan to lobby for clearer policies protecting soldiers who refuse illegal orders. Meanwhile, the Pentagon could issue fresh memos reinforcing established law. All these moves aim to ensure service members receive consistent and lawful instructions.

Final thoughts on leadership and legality

Good military leadership depends on trust and respect for rules. When top officials send mixed messages, troops can feel torn. They need to know when to follow orders and when to stand firm. In this era of global missions and complex threats, clear rules on illegal orders help protect both soldiers and civilians. Ultimately, consistency in policy builds stronger forces and upholds justice.

Frequently Asked Questions

What counts as an illegal order?

An illegal order demands actions that break U.S. laws or international treaties. Examples include war crimes or acts of torture.

Can soldiers refuse any order they dislike?

No. Troops may refuse only orders that clearly violate legal rules. They must show the command crosses a legal line.

Why is there debate over drug boat strikes?

Officials claim drug smugglers threatened safety at sea. Critics allege there is little proof, raising fears of unlawful actions.

How does military law protect troops?

Military law and international rules shield service members who reject criminal orders. These laws aim to prevent war crimes.