Key Takeaways:

• Federal judges have been overstepping their authority since President Donald Trump’s second term.
• Local judges in Wisconsin are now following suit, misusing their power in shocking ways.
• Three Wisconsin judges recently faced consequences for violating judicial conduct codes.
• Experts warn this trend is a dangerous copycat behavior learned from rogue federal judges.

Judges Acting Like Kings

In recent weeks, three Wisconsin judges have been caught misusing their power. This trend is part of a larger problem where judges, both federal and local, are overstepping their authority.

A recent analysis highlights how these judges are behaving more like rulers than impartial officials. They are ignoring the law and disrespecting the system they swore to uphold.

A Judge’s Shocking Behavior

One case involves Judge Ellen Berz of Dane County. She lost her temper when a defendant didn’t show up to court for a drunk driving case. The defendant was actually in the hospital. Judge Berz ordered her bailiff to fetch the man from the hospital. When the bailiff refused, she announced she would go herself.

Thankfully, Judge Berz changed her mind before things got out of hand. However, the Wisconsin Supreme Court still suspended her for one week. They ruled her actions were disrespectful and hurt public trust in the judiciary.

A Judge Helps a Fugitive Escape

In another shocking case, Milwaukee County Judge Hannah Dugan was indicted for obstructing a U.S. agency. She allegedly helped a fugitive avoid arrest by federal agents.

Here’s how it happened: Eduardo Flores-Ruiz, an illegal immigrant with a criminal record, was in Judge Dugan’s courtroom. When federal agents came to arrest him, Dugan reportedly misled them. After the agents left, she escorted Flores-Ruiz out of the courtroom through a side door. He was later caught after a chase.

This reckless behavior led to Judge Dugan’s arrest, jailing, and indictment. Her actions were a clear violation of the law and judicial ethics.

A Judge Threatens to Defy ICE

A third case involves Judge Monica Isham of Sawyer County. She sent an email to other judges, vowing to stop ICE agents from arresting anyone in her courtroom. She compared deportation to sending people to “concentration camps” and even joked about raising bail money.

Her actions and words were so extreme that they triggered an investigation. Experts say her behavior undermines the rule of law and erodes public confidence in the courts.

A Dangerous Trend

These cases are not isolated incidents. They are part of a larger pattern where judges, especially at the federal level, are overstepping their authority. Since President Trump’s second term, many federal judges have been acting like they have the power to make decisions for the executive branch. This includes issues like deporting illegal immigrants, firing employees, and altering programs created by executive orders.

The analysis warns that local judges are now imitating this rogue behavior. This is a dangerous trend that threatens the balance of power in our government. It also erodes public trust in the judiciary.

Experts Sound the Alarm

Judge James C. Ho of the U.S. Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals has spoken out against this judicial overreach. He reminded us that our founding fathers rebelled against a king to prevent such abuses of power. “Our founders didn’t fight a Revolutionary War to replace one king in royal garb with hundreds of kings in judicial robes,” he said.

Ho emphasized that when district judges abuse their power to block lawful policies, appellate courts must step in to restore order.

The Root of the Problem

The Federalist commentary compares this trend to an old anti-drug commercial. In the ad, a father confronts his son for smoking marijuana, only to be told, “I learned it by watching you!” The message is clear: local judges are learning this dangerous behavior by watching rogue federal judges.

For years, leftist federal judges have been issuing questionable rulings to block Trump’s policies. This includes everything from deporting violent illegal immigrants to defunding universities and NGOs that abuse civil rights.

Now, local judges are following suit, thinking they can act above the law. This is a recipe for disaster.

What’s Next?

The cases of Judges Berz, Dugan, and Isham are just the tip of the iceberg. If this trend continues, it could lead to a full-blown crisis in our judicial system. The answer lies in holding these rogue judges accountable and restoring the proper balance of power.

As Judge Ho said, appellate courts must step in when lower courts abuse their power. Only then can we ensure that judges act as servants of the law, not kings in robes.

In the end, this is not just about a few bad judges. It’s about preserving the integrity of our courts and the trust of the American people. When judges act like kings, everyone loses.

Key Takeaways:

• U.S. hospitals offering transgender care to minors must share treatment details.
• They have 30 days to provide info on surgeries and hormone therapies.
• CMS says these procedures are risky and often taxpayer-funded.
• The move aims to ensure treatments are safe and effective.

The U.S. government is asking hospitals that provide care to transgender youth for detailed information about their treatments. This move has sparked debate across the country.

What’s Happening?

On Wednesday, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) sent letters to certain hospitals. These hospitals offer medical care to children with gender dysphoria, a condition where a person feels their gender differs from the sex they were born with.

CMS, led by Administrator Dr. Mehmet Oz, wants these hospitals to share specific data. They’re asking for details about the quality of care and how these services are funded.

What Are They Looking For?

The letters focus on medical interventions for gender dysphoria in children. These interventions can include surgeries and hormone therapies. CMS is asking hospitals to explain their standards for these treatments and how they ensure safety.

Dr. Oz stated, “These irreversible, high-risk procedures are being done on vulnerable children, often at taxpayer expense.” He believes it’s important to review these practices closely.

Why Is This Happening?

This step by CMS is part of a broader discussion about transgender healthcare for minors. supporters argue that such treatments are life-saving and medically necessary. They say these interventions help young people align their bodies with their gender identity.

On the other hand, some lawmakers and groups express concerns. They argue that these treatments can have long-term effects and may not always be in the best interest of children.

What’s Next?

Hospitals that received the letters have 30 days to respond. They must provide detailed information about their practices. CMS will review this data to assess the quality and safety of the care being provided.

This move could lead to changes in how transgender healthcare is regulated in the U.S. It’s also likely to fuel ongoing debates about the role of the government in medical decisions.

A Growing Debate

The issue of transgender healthcare for minors has been a hot topic in recent years. Some states have passed laws to limit access to these treatments, while others have defended them as essential.

Advocates for transgender rights argue that access to gender-affirming care is crucial for the mental and emotional well-being of transgender youth. They point to studies showing that such care can reduce depression and suicidal thoughts.

Others, including some medical professionals, argue that more research is needed. They believe decisions about these treatments should be made cautiously, considering the potential long-term effects.

What Do Hospitals Say?

So far, hospitals that provide these services have not publicly commented on the CMS letters. However, many medical organizations, like the American Medical Association, have supported gender-affirming care for minors. They say these treatments are evidence-based and save lives.

On the other hand, some hospitals may welcome the review. They might see it as an opportunity to demonstrate the safety and effectiveness of their programs.

How Does This Affect Patients?

For transgender youth and their families, this could mean uncertainty about future access to care. If CMS finds that certain treatments are unsafe, it could lead to stricter regulations or funding cuts.

This could also mean that hospitals will need to be more transparent about their practices. Patients and families may benefit from clearer information about what treatments are available and their potential risks.

What Do Taxpayers Think?

The fact that many of these treatments are funded by taxpayer money is a key point in the debate. Some people argue that they should have a say in how their taxes are used for healthcare.

Others believe that healthcare is a right and that everyone deserves access to necessary treatments, regardless of cost. They argue that funding these services is a matter of equality and human rights.

A Call for Transparency

At the heart of this issue is a call for transparency. CMS wants to ensure that taxpayer money is being used wisely and that patients are receiving safe, high-quality care.

By gathering more information, the government hopes to make informed decisions about the future of transgender healthcare for minors. This could lead to better oversight and more consistent standards across the country.

The Bigger Picture

This move by CMS is part of a larger trend of government involvement in healthcare. As medical practices evolve, policymakers must decide how to regulate them.

In the case of transgender care, the stakes are high. The decisions made now could shape the lives of thousands of young people and their families for years to come.

What’s Next for Transgender Healthcare?

Only time will tell how this situation unfolds. Hospitals will need to respond to CMS’s requests, and policymakers will review the data. Depending on the findings, there could be changes in how these services are provided and funded.

For now, the focus is on ensuring that care is safe, effective, and accessible to those who need it. The outcome of this review will be closely watched by many.

A Message from CMS

Dr. Oz and CMS are clear about their goals. They want