17.9 C
Los Angeles
Friday, October 10, 2025

Speedy Grand Jury in James Case Raises Questions

Key Takeaways • New York Attorney General Letitia...

Inside the Shutdown Drama

Key Takeaways • House Republicans are missing as...

Why Trump’s Perfect Cognitive Exam Claim Sparks Debate

Key Takeaways President Trump said he earned...
Home Blog Page 713

‘s First Interview Sparks Controversy

Brent Edward
-
0
‘s First Interview Sparks Controversy

Key Takeaways:
– Robert F. Kennedy Jr. made misleading statements in his first HHS interview.
– He discussed seed oils, an abortion drug, and U.S. health claims.
– The Senate confirmed him on a party-line vote, with McConnell dissenting.
– His comments have drawn significant public and expert scrutiny.

Robert F. Kennedy Jr., the newly appointed Secretary of Health and Human Services, stirred up controversy in his first interview since taking office. Speaking with Fox News’ Laura Ingraham on February 14, Kennedy made several claims that experts and critics have labeled as incorrect or misleading. His remarks touched on topics ranging from seed oils to the health of the American population.

What He Said About Seed Oils

One of the points Kennedy emphasized was his stance on seed oils. He suggested that these oils, commonly found in many foods, are detrimental to health. However, health experts disagree, pointing out that seed oils are a good source of essential fatty acids and vitamins. They also highlight that seed oils can lower cholesterol levels when used in moderation. Kennedy’s statements on seed oils have been met with confusion, as they contradict widely accepted nutritional guidelines.

Remarks on Abortion Drug

Kennedy also sparked debate with his comments on a specific abortion drug. He claimed that the medication is unsafe and has severe side effects. However, extensive research and data show that the drug is both effective and safe when used as directed. Medical professionals have expressed concern that Kennedy’s statements could mislead the public and discourage people from using a proven medical option.

Claim About U.S. Health

Another controversial statement from Kennedy was his assertion that the U.S. has the “sickest population in the world.” While it is true that the U.S. faces challenges such as high obesity rates and healthcare access issues, global health rankings tell a different story. The U.S. actually ranks higher in terms of life expectancy and access to advanced medical care compared to many other countries. Critics argue that Kennedy’s claim oversimplifies the complex issue of national health.

Background on His Appointment

Kennedy’s interview came just a day after his Senate confirmation. The vote was sharply divided, with 52 senators voting in favor and 48 against. Notably, Senator Mitch McConnell was the only Republican to oppose Kennedy’s nomination, signaling some unease within the party about his candidacy. Despite the division, Kennedy’s confirmation marks a significant shift in leadership at the Department of Health and Human Services.

Public Reaction and Expert Responses

Kennedy’s statements have generated a lot of buzz, both within the medical community and among the general public. Many have echoed concerns raised by experts, questioning how someone in such a critical role could share such misleading information. Others have defended Kennedy, arguing that he is bringing a fresh perspective to the role. As the conversation continues to unfold, it’s clear that Kennedy’s leadership will be closely watched in the coming months.

Moving Forward

As Kennedy settles into his new role, the focus will be on how his views translate into policy. The Department of Health and Human Services plays a crucial role in shaping the nation’s health landscape, from food safety to drug regulations. While Kennedy’s interview has raised eyebrows, it also highlights the importance of informed leadership in such a pivotal position.

Related News:

– Kennedy’s Confirmation: A Divided Senate
– The confirmation process for Robert F. Kennedy Jr. was anything but smooth. With a 52 to 48 vote, the Senate reflected the deep political divide surrounding his nomination. While many Democrats opposed his candidacy due to his controversial views, most Republicans stood by him, seeing him as a breath of fresh air in the stagnant political arena. The lone dissent from Senator Mitch McConnell added an extra layer of intrigue to the proceedings, leaving many to wonder what led to his decision.

– The Backlash Against Kennedy’s Statements
– Kennedy’s interview with Laura Ingraham has sparked a firestorm of criticism. Health experts, advocacy groups, and even some political allies have come forward to dispute his claims. The backlash has been intense, with many calling for greater accountability from public officials, especially those in health-related roles. The debate raises important questions about the role of truth in public discourse and the responsibility of leaders to provide accurate information.

– What’s Next for the Department of Health and Human Services?
– With Kennedy at the helm, the Department of Health and Human Services is likely to see some significant changes. From revisiting food safety guidelines to reevaluating drug policies, Kennedy’s influence could be far-reaching. As the nation waits to see how his vision will take shape, one thing is certain: the road ahead will be anything but uneventful.

Conclusion

Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s first interview as Secretary of Health and Human Services has created quite the stir. His comments on seed oils, abortion drugs, and the health of the U.S. population have been met with skepticism and concern. As the dust settles, the focus will remain on how these views shape the policies of the Department of Health and Human Services. Whether you agree with his stance or not, one thing is clear: Kennedy’s tenure is going to be closely watched.

Republicans Use Obscure Law to Roll Back Biden Rules

Brent Edward
-
0
Republicans Use Obscure Law to Roll Back Biden Rules

Key Takeaways:
– Republicans in Congress are using the Congressional Review Act to overturn Biden-era regulations.
– The law allows Congress to quickly repeal rules without senate filibusters.
– This tactic avoids meaningful policy debates and blocks future administrations from reinstating the rules.
– Critics call this a flawed way to check executive power.

Republicans Turn to a Little-Known Law to Undo Biden Rules

Republicans in Congress are under pressure from voters to hold the Biden administration accountable. Instead of using their main powers to create new laws or investigate, they’re relying on a lesser-known tool called the Congressional Review Act. This law lets them undo rules made by the previous administration quickly and quietly.

What Is the Congressional Review Act?

The Congressional Review Act, or CRA, was passed in the 1990s. It’s part of a push to reduce government regulations. The law allows Congress to overturn rules created by federal agencies within a certain timeframe. Once a rule is repealed, future administrations can’t bring it back.

For example, if Congress uses the CRA to repeal a banking rule, no future president can reinstate it. This makes the CRA a powerful but controversial tool.

How Does the CRA Work?

Here’s how it works: If Congress disagrees with a rule made by a federal agency, they can introduce a resolution to disapprove it. The resolution needs a simple majority in both the House and Senate. If it passes and the president signs it, the rule is erased.

The CRA is unusual because it bypasses the usual Senate filibuster rules. This makes it easier for Republicans to act without Democratic support.

Why Are Republicans Using the CRA Now?

During Barack Obama’s presidency, Republicans used the CRA to undo several of his regulations. The Biden administration tried to avoid this by finalizing most of its rules early, so the next Congress couldn’t use the CRA.

But a few rules were finalized too late. Republicans are now targeting one of them: a rule that limits how much banks can charge in overdraft fees. This rule, finalized recently, is still eligible for repeal under the CRA.

Critics Call the CRA a Weak Check on Power

James Goodwin, a regulatory expert, says the CRA is not a real way to balance power in government. He argues that instead of encouraging meaningful debate, the CRA lets lawmakers undo rules without offering better solutions.

“By design, CRA resolutions offer no guidance on what the rule should look like instead,” Goodwin writes. “This undermines Congress’s role in policymaking.”

Why the CRA Is Controversial

The CRA is controversial for a few reasons:

1. It Skips Debate: The CRA allows Congress to repeal rules without discussing their merits or flaws.
2. It Limits Future Action: Once a rule is repealed, no future administration can bring it back, even if circumstances change.
3. It Avoids Real Solutions: Instead of creating new policies, lawmakers are focused on undoing old ones.

The Impact of the CRA

The CRA has been used over a dozen times to undo Obama-era rules, mostly on environmental and labor protections. Now, Republicans are aiming to use it again to roll back consumer-friendly regulations.

For instance, the rule on overdraft fees aims to protect consumers from high bank charges. Repealing it could cost consumers millions of dollars.

A Debate Over Power and Policy

Some argue that the CRA is a way for Congress to reassert its authority over the executive branch. But critics, like Goodwin, say it’s the wrong approach.

“Congress should focus on using its real powers to create better policies,” Goodwin says. “The CRA is just a quick fix that doesn’t solve anything.”

What’s Next?

Republicans are likely to keep using the CRA as long as it’s an effective way to undo Biden-era rules. But critics hope Congress will focus on creating new laws rather than just repealing old ones.

In the end, the debate over the CRA is about how Congress should balance its power with the executive branch. While the CRA offers a quick way to undo rules, it doesn’t help lawmakers create better policies for the future.

This approach to governance raises important questions about how Congress should use its authority. While the CRA provides a fast way to overturn rules, it doesn’t encourage meaningful dialogue or innovation. As the debate continues, one thing is clear: the way Congress uses its power will shape the rules that affect everyday Americans.

Louisiana’s Top Doc Not Certified in Family Medicine

Brent Edward
-
0
Louisiana’s Top Doc Not Certified in Family Medicine

Key Takeaways:
– Dr. Ralph Abraham is Louisiana’s Surgeon General and described as a family medicine physician.
– He is not listed as board-certified in family medicine.
– Board certification is not required to practice medicine but is considered an extra step.
– Some doctors worry people might think Abraham is certified when he is not.
– Family medicine is a distinct specialty requiring extra training and exams.
– Abraham has stopped the state’s efforts to promote vaccines.
– Other doctors have criticized his stance on vaccines.

Louisiana’s top public health official, Dr. Ralph Abraham, is known as a family medicine physician. But he is not listed as board-certified in this specialty. Let’s break down what this means and why some doctors are concerned.

Who is Dr. Ralph Abraham?
Dr. Abraham is Louisiana’s Surgeon General. He was also a congressman for Louisiana’s 5th District. His biography says he is a practicing family medicine physician in Richland Parish. He studied medicine at LSU School of Medicine in Shreveport. Before becoming a doctor, he practiced veterinary medicine for 10 years.

What’s the Issue with Board Certification?
Board certification is not required for a doctor to practice medicine. It’s an extra step that shows a doctor has met certain standards in their specialty. For family medicine, certification comes from the American Board of Family Medicine. Dr. Abraham is not listed as board-certified in this group’s records. He also is not registered with the Louisiana Academy of Family Physicians.

Why Does Board Certification Matter?
Some doctors, like Dr. Rick Streiffer, are worried that people might think Dr. Abraham is board-certified when he isn’t. Dr. Streiffer is a professor and expert in family medicine. He says family medicine is a specific field that requires extra training and exams. It’s not just a general term for a family doctor. Streiffer adds that family medicine is a tough field because it covers everything from babies to older adults.

To become board-certified in family medicine, doctors must complete a residency program and pass an exam. They also need to stay updated on medical knowledge. Streiffer says this ensures they meet high standards of care.

What Do Other Doctors Think?
Dr. Vincent Shaw, president of the Louisiana Academy of Family Physicians, says board certification shows a commitment to quality care. He adds that certified doctors must keep learning and stay updated on the latest medical research.

Abraham’s Role in Public Health
Dr. Abraham has made headlines for his decisions on vaccines. He stopped the state’s efforts to promote COVID, flu, and mpox vaccines. He also banned all vaccine promotion events. This has been controversial. Eight medical groups in Louisiana, including the Louisiana Academy of Family Physicians, signed a letter opposing the politicization of vaccines.

Abraham’s Views on Vaccines
Abraham and Deputy Surgeon General Dr. Wyche Coleman have shared misinformation about vaccines. Coleman was a board-certified ophthalmologist but is no longer certified. Abraham also supports Robert F. Kennedy Jr., an anti-vaccine activist who is now President Trump’s health secretary.

Why This Matters
Family medicine is a well-established specialty. The American Board of Family Medicine was created in 1969 to set standards for this field. Certification shows a doctor has met these standards. Some doctors worry that if Dr. Abraham calls himself a family medicine physician without certification, it could confuse the public.

Conclusion
Dr. Ralph Abraham is a key figure in Louisiana’s public health. While he describes himself as a family medicine physician, he is not board-certified in this specialty. Some doctors are concerned this could mislead people. They believe board certification is important for ensuring quality care. Abraham’s stance on vaccines has also sparked debate. As Louisiana’s Surgeon General, his actions and words carry significant weight in shaping the state’s health policies.

Trump’s Economic Polls Worry Republicans

Brent Edward
-
0
Trump’s Economic Polls Worry Republicans

Key Takeaways:
– Only 20% of Americans think the economy is good or excellent now.
– This is the lowest number during Trump’s time in office.
– More people think the economy will get worse, not better.
– These numbers are worse than during Trump’s first term.

Harry Enten from CNN shared some troubling news for Donald Trump. Just over a month into Trump’s second term, Americans are unhappy with the economy. They also don’t think things will improve, and that’s a bad sign for Trump’s approval ratings.

Americans’ Outlook on the Economy

Enten compared the current economy to Trump’s first term. In April 2017, 40% of Americans thought the economy was good or excellent. Fast forward to February 2025, only 20% feel the same way. That’s half the number from 2017.

This 20% is even lower than the best part of Trump’s first term. In February 2020, 63% of Americans said the economy was excellent or good. Today, that number is much smaller. In fact, it’s the lowest it’s been during Trump’s time in office.

The Future Looks Bleak

Things don’t seem promising for the future either. In 2017, 53% of Americans thought the economy was getting better. Now, in 2025, 59% say it’s getting worse. Only 35% believe it will improve.

Enten called this number “much more worrisome” than anything he saw during Trump’s first term, even before COVID-19. It’s concerning because even if the economy isn’t great now, people think it will only get worse.

WhatDoes This Mean for Trump?

These poll numbers are a warning sign for Trump. If people are unhappy with the economy and don’t see hope for the future, it could hurt his approval ratings. Economies are a big part of how people judge presidents.

In a Nutshell

All of this is bad news for Trump. Fewer people think the economy is doing well now, and even more think it will get worse. This could be a sign that Trump’s second term is not starting as strongly as his first one.

Highland Park Shooter’s Trial Begins

Brent Edward
-
0
Highland Park Shooter’s Trial Begins

Key Takeaways:
– Robert Crimo III faces trial for killing seven and injuring 48 at a Fourth of July parade.
– His father, Robert Crimo Jr., was convicted for helping him obtain the gun.
– Crimo has a history of mental illness and erratic behavior.
– The trial highlights issues of gun control and parental responsibility.
– The case could last six weeks, with Crimo facing life without parole.

Trial Starts for Highland Park Shooter

The trial of Robert Crimo III, accused of killing seven and wounding 48 at a 2022 Independence Day parade in Highland Park, Illinois, began Monday. Crimo, 24, faces multiple charges, including murder and attempted murder.

Background of Robert Crimo III

Crimo has a history of mental health issues and erratic behavior. Police visited his home in 2019 after a suicide attempt and a threat to kill his family. Knives were seized but returned after his father claimed them.

The Shooting Details

On July 4, 2022, Crimo allegedly fired into the crowd from a rooftop, using a semi-automatic rifle with three 30-round magazines. Disguised in women’s clothing and makeup, he fled and was caught after an eight-hour chase.

Father’s Role and Conviction

Robert Crimo Jr. helped his son obtain the gun despite knowing his mental health history. He pleaded guilty to misdemeanor charges and received 60 days in jail and probation. This case is rare, as parents are seldom held criminally liable for their children’s actions.

Community and Legal Reactions

Highland Park, known for its tranquility and affluent residents, including Michael Jordan, banned assault rifles in 2013. The shooting has pushed for stricter gun laws and accountability for parents.

Trial Expectations

Crimo’s trial is expected to last six weeks. If convicted, he faces life in prison without parole. The case draws attention to mental health, gun control, and parental responsibility.

Broader Implications

The case mirrors the 2021 Michigan school shooting where parents were convicted of involuntary manslaughter. It underscores the debate on gun access for mentally troubled youths.

Conclusion

Robert Crimo III’s trial is a significant case, highlighting critical issues in U.S. society. As the trial progresses, it may set precedents for future cases involving gun violence and parental accountability.

Federal Officials Push Back Against Musk’s Email

Brent Edward
-
0
Federal Officials Push Back Against Musk’s Email

Key Takeaways:
– Federal departments are telling employees to ignore Elon Musk’s email.
– Some departments suggest being brief in responses.
– Few agencies are complying with Musk’s request.
– The White House has not commented yet.

What Happened?

Elon Musk, a well-known businessman, recently sent an email to many federal employees. The email asked them to list what they did the past week and send it to their bosses. Musk even tweeted that not replying would be seen as quitting. But some federal leaders are pushing back, telling employees they don’t have to listen to Musk.

Who Is Pushing Back?

The FBI and the State Department are among those opposed. Kash Patel, the FBI Director, told employees to wait before responding. The State Department said they’d handle the response themselves. Meanwhile, Ed Martin, a U.S. attorney, suggested keeping answers short and promised to protect his team.

Some Are Complying

Not everyone is ignoring Musk. The Secret Service Director told employees to respond as instructed. This shows a split in how different agencies are handling the situation.

What’s Next?

Musk’s move has sparked confusion. Some see it as overstepping, while others follow through. The White House has yet to comment, leaving many questions unanswered. For now, federal workers are caught in the middle, unsure how to proceed.

Conclusion

This situation highlights the limits of Musk’s authority. While some comply, others resist, showing the complexity of federal operations. The lack of a White House response adds to the uncertainty, leaving everyone waiting for further instructions.

Meeus Makes History: First Win of ’25 Season in Algarve

Jonathan Antonio
-
0
Meeus Makes History: First Win of ’25 Season in Algarve

Key Takeaways:

– Jordi Meeus secures his first official win of the 2025 season at Stage 3 of the Volta ao Algarve.
– Meeus’s Stage 1 victory was nullified after the peloton took a wrong turn.
– He triumphed in Tavira, outshining top sprinters like Wout van Aert.
– Meeus credits teamwork and perfect timing for his success.
– He plans to race in Omloop Nieuwsblad and Kuurne-Brussels-Kuurne next.

A True Triumph for Jordi Meeus

Excitement was in the air as Jordi Meeus claimed his first official win of the 2025 season at Stage 3 of the Volta ao Algarve. Just 48 hours earlier, Meeus thought he’d won Stage 1, only to find out the race had been called off after most riders took a wrong turn. But in Tavira, he made sure there was no doubt.

The finish in Tavira was slightly uphill, and Meeus, riding for Red Bull-Bora-Hansgrohe, timed his sprint perfectly. He followed Casper van Uden’s early move, then accelerated to cross the line first. “I’m happy there was a real finish line this time,” Meeus said with a smile.

The Finish That Changed Everything

Meeus had Londres on his mind after Stage 1’s confusion. “It was frustrating, but I knew I had the speed,” he explained. Stage 3 proved him right. The slightly uphill finish suited him, and he used the last corner to his advantage.

With a kilometer to go, Meeus was a bit far back but managed to move up. Following Van Uden’s wheel, he timed his sprint impeccably. “It all came down to timing,” he said.

After the race, Meeus made it clear that this was his first official win of the season. Though he could have had two, he’s just glad for the one. “I’m really happy with it,” he added.

Teamwork Pays Off

Meeus’s success wasn’t just his own doing. His team, Red Bull-Bora-Hansgrohe, played a crucial role. The team split their efforts between Meeus and GC contender Primoš Roglič. Meeus praised the teamwork, saying, “The two groups work well together. We stayed in front for Primož until three kilometers to the finish, then the sprinters took over.”

Meeus might not be a frequent winner, but he’s had big victories, like his 2023 Tour de France stage win on the Champs Elysées. This win, however, is a major confidence boost. “It’s an extra motivation,” he admitted.

Looking Ahead

Next up for Meeus is the Omloop Nieuwsblad and Kuurne-Brussels-Kuurne, followed by an altitude training camp. His sights are set on the Tour of Flanders and Paris-Roubaix. But before that, there’s still Saturday’s Stage 4 in Faro, another likely sprint finish. Meeus might just add another win to his Algarve tally.

The future looks bright for this young sprinter. With his speed, teamwork, and determination, Jordi Meeus is definitely one to watch this season.

Stay tuned for more updates on Jordi Meeus and the Volta ao Algarve!

Adams’ Corruption Trial Delayed: What You Need to Know

Brent Edward
-
0
Adams’ Corruption Trial Delayed: What You Need to Know

Key Takeaways:

– Judge Dale Ho delays Mayor Eric Adams’ corruption trial indefinitely.
– Independent attorney Paul Clement will argue against the DOJ’s request to dismiss charges.
– The case isn’t over yet, despite the DOJ’s motion to drop it.
– Prosecutors resigned, claiming the dismissal was part of a political deal.
– Legal experts praise Judge Ho’s decision as fair and thoughtful.

Judge Dale Ho made a big decision on Friday about Mayor Eric Adams’ corruption trial. The trial has been delayed indefinitely, but it’s not over yet. Instead, Judge Ho appointed Paul Clement, a well-known lawyer, to argue against the Department of Justice’s request to dismiss the charges. Let’s break this down and understand what it means.

What Happened So Far

The DOJ charged Mayor Adams with corruption last year. But things took a surprising turn when President Donald Trump’s administration asked to drop the case. This caused a lot of upset in the Department of Justice. At least seven prosecutors quit because they refused to sign the motion to dismiss the charges.

Some of these prosecutors later spoke out. They accused Emil Bove, the acting Deputy Attorney General, of dropping the charges as part of a deal. They claimed Adams agreed to help Trump with mass immigrant deportations in exchange for the charges being dropped.

Bove asked the court to dismiss the case but left the door open to bring it back later. Judge Ho agreed to the dismissal request but wants more information before making a final decision. That’s where Paul Clement comes in.

Who Is Paul Clement?

Paul Clement is a respected lawyer with a strong background in conservative law. He was appointed by a Republican president as the Solicitor General, which means he has a lot of experience arguing cases in front of the Supreme Court. Judge Ho chose him because he’s seen as impartial and fair.

Clement’s job now is to argue against the DOJ’s motion to dismiss the case. He’ll present his arguments to Judge Ho, who will then decide what happens next.

What Do Legal Experts Say?

Legal experts think Judge Ho made a smart move by appointing Paul Clement. Ryan Goodman, the editor of Just Security, called it “the right thing” because it ensures the case gets a fair hearing.

Ben Kochman, a judicial reporter for the New York Post, wrote that Adams and Trump’s Justice Department want people to think the case is over. But it’s not. Judge Ho is carefully considering the issues.

Mimi Rocah, a former district attorney, praised Judge Ho for getting to the heart of the legal issues. She called Clement’s appointment “very smart and very judicial.”

Kristy Greenberg, a former deputy chief of the SDNY criminal division, said the case is still alive for now. She believes appointing Clement is a positive step and shows the court isn’t just doing what the DOJ wants.

What’s Next?

The case is still ongoing, and Judge Ho is taking his time to make sure everything is handled fairly. Eric Columbus, a former DOJ official, said this shows Judge Ho isn’t rushing to dismiss the charges without good reason. He might even decide to dismiss the case with prejudice, which would mean it can’t be brought back in the future.

Steve Vladeck, a law professor at Georgetown, called Judge Ho’s decision “savvy” because it shows he’s taking the case seriously.

Joshua Erlich, a civil rights lawyer, said Clement is a fighter who cares about winning. If Clement agreed to take this case, he’ll do his best to argue against dismissing the charges.

Why This Matters

This case is important because it shows how politics and the justice system can sometimes clash. The fact that prosecutors resigned and spoke out suggests they believed the DOJ’s decision to drop the charges wasn’t fair.

Judge Ho’s decision to appoint an independent lawyer like Paul Clement ensures the case gets a fair hearing. It’s a way to make sure the justice system isn’t being used for political favors.

Final Thoughts

In short, Mayor Adams’ corruption trial is still up in the air. Judge Ho is taking extra steps to make sure the case is handled fairly, even if it takes more time. The appointment of Paul Clement is a sign that the court isn’t ready to let the case go without a fight.

As Ben Kochman said, the case isn’t over yet. Judge Ho is carefully considering all the arguments, and the outcome could have big implications for both Adams and the justice system. Stay tuned for more updates as this story unfolds.

Neilson Powless Battles Back After Pneumonia at Volta ao Algarve

Jonathan Antonio
-
0
Neilson Powless Battles Back After Pneumonia at Volta ao Algarve

Key Takeaways:

– Neilson Powless faced a tough off-season due to pneumonia but is on the mend.
– He competed in the Volta ao Algarve, showing progress but not yet at full strength.
– Powless aims to rebuild his form for upcoming races like Paris-Nice and the Classics.
– He remains optimistic, saying time and consistent training will help him regain his peak performance.

Neilson Powless: The Road to Recovery

Neilson Powless, a top cyclist for EF Education-EasyPost, has had a rollercoaster few months. Just a little over a month ago, he was battling pneumonia, a serious illness that put his training and racing plans on hold. Now, he’s back on the bike, racing in the Volta ao Algarve, and slowly getting back to his best.

A Tough Start to the Season

Powless was on fire at the end of 2024. He won big races like the Gran Piemonte and the Japan Cup, which boosted his confidence for 2025. But things took a turn for the worse in January when he got pneumonia.

“I was feeling super strong in January, setting records in testing,” Powless explained. “I thought I was going to start the season with a bang.”

But pneumonia changed everything. For weeks, he was sick one week and healthy the next. His training was disrupted, and he couldn’t build the fitness he needed.

Racing at Volta ao Algarve

At the Volta ao Algarve, Powless showed signs of his old self. In the second stage, he joined a breakaway group early on, which was a smart move. “I wasn’t going to beat riders like Jonas Vingegaard or Primož Roglič,” he said. “So I was happy to get in front and see what I could do.”

On the final climb of the stage, he finished 10th, which was a good result. But deep down, he knew he wasn’t where he wanted to be. “I didn’t have the legs in the end,” he admitted. “The climbs were tough, and I couldn’t carry speed easily.”

Progress, But Not Yet 100%

By the third stage, Powless had time to reflect on his performance. While he was happy to be back racing, he knew he still had work to do.

“I’m missing some depth,” he said. “I hope the Algarve will help me get back to where I was. I’m feeling good on the bike, but I still get more tired than usual at the end of races.”

Looking Ahead

Powless is staying positive and focused on the road ahead. He knows it will take time to fully recover and rebuild his fitness.

“I think it’s just time,” he said. “My body needs to get used to pushing hard again. I need consistent training, more than just one week at a time.”

His goals are clear. He wants a good finish in the Volta ao Algarve and a strong performance in Paris-Nice. His bigger focus is on the Classics, where he hopes to make a big impact.

Determination and Resilience

Neilson Powless’s story is one of resilience. He went from being at the top of his game to facing a serious setback. Now, he’s fighting his way back, step by step.

“I feel like it’s coming back,” he said. “I’m getting more consistent each day. I just need to get some depth back by the time the Classics roll around.”

Fans can expect to see Powless back to his best soon. He’s determined to make up for lost time and show the cycling world what he’s made of.

Let us know your thoughts on Neilson Powless’s comeback!

Trump Names Pam Bondi as New AG Nominee, Replacing Matt Gaetz

Jonathan Antonio
-
0
Trump Names Pam Bondi as New AG Nominee, Replacing Matt Gaetz

Key Takeaways:

– Pam Bondi is Trump’s new pick for U.S. Attorney General, replacing Matt Gaetz amid misconduct allegations.
– Bondi, a former Florida AG, brings 18 years of prosecutorial experience and strong loyalty to Trump.
– She has been married twice, engaged once, and is currently dating John Wakefield.

Trump’s New AG Nominee: Pam Bondi

In a swift move, Donald Trump has named Pam Bondi as his new nominee for U.S. Attorney General, replacing Matt Gaetz. Gaetz stepped down amid renewed attention to allegations of sexual misconduct, clearing the path for Bondi to step into the role. This change highlights Trump’s strategy to maintain a loyal and experienced team.

Who is Pam Bondi?

Bondi, a seasoned prosecutor, served as Florida’s Attorney General from 2011 to 2019. Her 18 years in the legal arena give her a strong foundation for the role. Beyond her professional credentials, Bondi is a steadfast Trump supporter. She defended him during his first impeachment and backed his claims of election fraud, showcasing her alignment with his policies.

Bondi’s Personal Life

While Bondi’s professional life is well-documented, her personal life is less so. She has been married twice. Her first marriage, to Garret Barnes, lasted just 22 months, ending in 1990. Six years later, she married Scott Fitzgerald, but that union also ended in divorce in 2002.

Bondi was engaged to ophthalmologist Greg Henderson in 2012. Though they planned a grand wedding, it never took place, fueling rumors of a split, which surfaced in 2015.

Current Relationship

Bondi is now dating John Wakefield. The couple shares moments on Instagram, including a recent Buccaneers game. Wakefield first appeared on her social media in 2017 at a Bruno Mars concert. His profile mentions three children, calling them “my 3 monster children,” indicating he’s a father.

Conclusion

Pam Bondi’s nomination as U.S. Attorney General marks a strategic move by Trump to appoint a loyal and experienced figure. While her personal life has seen its share of ups and downs, her current relationship with John Wakefield suggests she’s found stability. This nomination underscores Trump’s focus on loyalty and experience as he builds his administration.

1...712713714...1,951Page 713 of 1,951