57.4 F
San Francisco
Sunday, May 10, 2026
Home Blog Page 957

John Ullyot Exits Pentagon Amid Turmoil

Brent Edward
-
0
John Ullyot Exits Pentagon Amid Turmoil

Key Takeaways:

  • John Ullyot resigns as senior Pentagon spokesperson.
  • He objected to a secondary role in public affairs.
  • His exit occurs during Pentagon controversies, including a leak investigation and a scandal involving high-ranking officials.
  • The Pentagon recently faced backlash over removing a story about Jackie Robinson, prompting Ullyot’s comment on DEI.

Introduction:

In a significant development, John Ullyot, a key figure at the Pentagon, has announced his resignation. This departure comes at a time when the Department of Defense faces multiple challenges, including internal scandals and leaking of sensitive information. Ullyot’s decision highlights the internal conflicts and changes in leadership roles within the department.

Reasons Behind Ullyot’s Exit:

Ullyot’s resignation stems from disagreements over his role. He expressed his reluctance to take on a secondary position in public affairs, desiring a more prominent role. Despite discussions with Secretary Pete Hegseth, no alternative position was agreed upon, leading to his decision to leave. Notably, Ullyot has conveyed his continued support for Hegseth, indicating that his departure is not due to a lack of confidence in the Secretary’s leadership.

Pentagon’s Current Challenges:

The Pentagon is grappling with several issues. Recently, three top officials were suspended as part of an investigation into a leak of sensitive information. Additionally, the department is dealing with the fallout from a chat scandal involving high-ranking officials, which has sparked internal and external criticism. These challenges underscore the turbulent environment within the Pentagon, affecting morale and public perception.

The Jackie Robinson Controversy:

Another point of contention was the removal of a story about Jackie Robinson from the Pentagon’s website. This decision was met with criticism, prompting Ullyot to comment that diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives at the department were ineffective. This incident reflects broader debates about the Pentagon’s commitment to DEI and its approach to addressing these issues.

Looking Ahead:

As Ullyot departs, the Pentagon faces the task of stabilizing its public affairs and communications strategy. His exit leaves a void that needs to be filled, especially during these challenging times. The department must address its internal conflicts and external scrutiny to maintain public trust and operational effectiveness.

Conclusion:

John Ullyot’s resignation marks another chapter in the Pentagon’s recent turmoil. With ongoing investigations and internal disputes, the department is under intense scrutiny. As it navigates these challenges, the Pentagon must work to restore stability and transparency, crucial for its operations and public image.

Hannity Slams Tax Hike Plan on the Rich

Brent Edward
-
0
Hannity Slams Tax Hike Plan on the Rich

Key Takeaways:

  • A proposal to increase taxes on individuals earning $1 million or more is under discussion in the White House.
  • Sean Hannity strongly opposes this plan, citing economic concerns and alignment with Trump’s policies.
  • The proposed tax rate would rise from 37% to 40% for high earners.
  • Grover Norquist and Mike Johnson have mixed reactions to the plan.

The Proposed Tax Plan

The White House is considering a new tax bracket targeting those earning $1 million or more annually. If approved, this group would face a 40% tax rate, up from the current 37%. This proposal aims to generate more revenue but has sparked debate among Republicans and conservatives.

Hannity’s Strong Reaction

Sean Hannity, a prominent Fox News anchor, has voiced strong opposition to the tax hike. Earning an estimated $45 million annually, Hannity argues that increasing taxes on the wealthy is detrimental to the economy. He believes this move contradicts President Trump’s past policies, which focused on tax cuts.

Economic Concerns and Policy Alignment

Hannity emphasized that such a tax increase could hinder economic growth. He suggested alternative approaches, such as making the Trump tax cuts permanent and eliminating taxes on tips, Social Security, and overtime. Hannity questioned why Republicans would consider tax increases when they should be focusing on long-term tax relief.

Opposition from Conservatives

Grover Norquist, a leading tax reform advocate, dismissed the proposal, stating it won’t happen. His confident stance reflects broader conservative opposition to tax increases, highlighting the intraparty debate.

Uncertainty in the Administration

House Speaker Mike Johnson’s non-committal response indicates uncertainty within the administration. His reluctance to commit suggests the proposal’s fate remains unclear, with ongoing discussions expected.

Musk’s Team Visits Labor Board Amid Data Controversy

Brent Edward
-
0
Musk’s Team Visits Labor Board Amid Data Controversy

Key Takeaways:

  • Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) sent representatives to the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB).
  • A whistleblower alleged that DOGE seized crucial labor data from the NLRB.
  • Experts raise concerns about the timing of the visit and potential data access.
  • Musk has a history of union-busting allegations and faces ongoing legal cases.

What Happened at the NLRB?

In a surprising move, representatives from Elon Musk’s DOGE task force recently visited the NLRB in Washington, D.C. This visit came shortly after a whistleblower revealed that DOGE might have taken important labor data from the agency. The NLRB, which handles labor disputes and union issues, had an email sent to its staff announcing the visit. The email stated that two DOGE representatives would work with the NLRB part-time for several months, mostly remotely. They requested information on agency operations but asked that personal details be removed from the documents provided.

Concerns Over Timing and Data Access

Experts are worried about the timing of this visit. Andrew Bakaj from Whistleblower Aid expressed concerns, stating that DOGE’s access to NLRB systems before an investigation is a red flag. He suggested isolating the systems and conducting a thorough investigation to ensure no data misuse. The quick action by DOGE after the whistleblower’s disclosure has raised suspicions about their intentions.

Musk’s History With Unions

Elon Musk has faced several allegations related to union-busting in his companies, including Tesla and SpaceX. Last year, the United Auto Workers requested an investigation into claims that Musk and former President Trump discussed illegally firing striking workers. This history adds fuel to the fire, with critics questioning whether Musk is trying to weaken union protections.

What’s Next?

The situation is complex, with multiple layers of investigation and legal battles. The NLRB’s role in protecting workers’ rights is crucial, and any interference could have significant implications. As investigations unfold, the focus will be on whether DOGE’s actions were appropriate and if Musk’s task force overstepped its boundaries.

Attack on Governor’s Home Sparks Debate Over Violence and Motives

Brent Edward
-
0
Attack on Governor’s Home Sparks Debate Over Violence and Motives

Key Takeaways:

  • Pennsylvania Governor Josh Shapiro’s official residence was firebombed.
  • Suspect Cody Balmer, 38, allegedly referenced Palestine during a 911 call.
  • Shapiro condemned the violence but avoided discussing motives.
  • Some leaders criticized Shapiro’s political stance, while others defended him.
  • Islamic groups and mosques denounced the attack.
  • Balmer has a history of mental health struggles, including bipolar disorder.

Governor’s Home Targeted in Firebombing

Pennsylvania Governor Josh Shapiro is safe after his official residence was firebombed in the early hours of Sunday morning. The attack has sparked widespread condemnation and raised questions about the suspect’s motives.

Cody Balmer, the man charged with attempted murder and terrorism, allegedly made a reference to Palestine during a call to authorities after the attack. According to court documents, Balmer told the dispatcher that Shapiro needs to stop harming his friends and that “our people have been put through too much by that monster.” He also mentioned cleaning up a banquet hall, likely referring to damage from the firebombing.

Shapiro, who is Jewish, has faced criticism for his support of Israel, particularly after labeling some pro-Palestine protests as antisemitic following the October 2023 Hamas attacks. Balmer’s remarks appear to tie the attack to Shapiro’s stance on Israel.

Shapiro Condemns Violence, Avoids Discussing Motives

Shapiro strongly condemned the attack, saying, “This kind of violence has no place in our society, regardless of what motivates it.” He emphasized that such acts must be rejected by everyone, including both political parties and people from all walks of life.

However, Shapiro avoided discussing Balmer’s motives, leaving that to prosecutors and law enforcement. He directed further questions to the Dauphin County district attorney’s office and the U.S. Department of Justice.

Political Tensions Rise in Wake of Attack

The attack has fueled political tensions in Pennsylvania. U.S. Rep. Dan Meuser, a Republican, expressed sympathy for Shapiro and his family but criticized the governor for his opposition to the Trump administration. Meuser suggested that Shapiro’s stance has contributed to political tension and urged him to “tone it down.”

Shapiro responded sharply, saying elected leaders have a responsibility to act and speak with moral clarity. “It would appear that the congressman failed to measure up to that,” Shapiro said, seemingly surprised by Meuser’s remarks.

Suspect’s Mental Health and Background

Court documents reveal that Balmer has struggled with mental health issues, including bipolar disorder. He has been treated in psychiatric hospitals twice. His mental health struggles may play a role in the investigation into the attack.

Balmer faces charges of attempted murder and terrorism. Search warrants for his home, a storage locker, and a DNA sample have provided additional details about his actions after the attack.

Community Leaders Condemn Violence

More than two dozen mosques and Islamic organizations across Pennsylvania have signed a letter denouncing the attack. The letter expresses shock and outrage, emphasizing that the acts Balmer is accused of do not represent the pro-Palestine movement.

Ahmet Tekelioglu, executive director of the Philadelphia chapter of the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), said, “The actions of one individual do not define an entire movement or community.” CAIR has provided local mosques, schools, and community centers with additional security guidance and encouraged increased communication with law enforcement.

A Call for Unity and Clarity

The attack on Governor Shapiro’s residence has sparked a broader conversation about political violence and its roots. While some have pointed to mental health as a factor, others have criticized political rhetoric for fueling tension.

Shapiro’s response has focused on unity, urging all sides to reject violence and work toward a peaceful resolution. “This level of violence has to end,” he said.

As the investigation continues, the case serves as a reminder of the challenges leaders face in balancing free speech, political opposition, and public safety. It also highlights the importance of addressing mental health and the need for unity in the face of violence.

US Government Shuts Down Office Fighting Foreign Disinformation

Brent Edward
-
0
US Government Shuts Down Office Fighting Foreign Disinformation

Secretary of State Marco Rubio recently announced the closure of a State Department office responsible for combating foreign disinformation. This office, known as the Counter Foreign Information Manipulation and Interference office (R/FIMI), was accused of using taxpayer money to silence American voices on social media, particularly those questioning the origins of COVID-19. Rubio claims this led to censorship and deplatforming, prompting an investigation into these actions. The closure is part of broader budget cuts under President Trump’s administration, even as foreign influence campaigns remain prevalent.

The Closure and Its Reasons

The shutting down of R/FIMI means the elimination of 50 full-time jobs and a funding cut of $65 million. Rubio argues the office crossed a line by enforcing censorship, citing instances where Americans were removed from platforms for their views. This decision reflects concerns about government overreach in free speech, particularly affecting right-wing voices.

What’s Next?

The State Department will investigate how Americans were deplatformed, aiming to address concerns about censorship. This move comes as foreign disinformation campaigns, using bots and AI, continue to influence public opinion, making the need for a balanced approach to counter these threats crucial.

Broader Implications

The closure of R/FIMI highlights the tension between fighting disinformation and protecting free speech. While foreign influence remains a significant threat, the shutdown raises questions about the government’s role in regulating information and the potential for censorship. This decision underscores the complexity of addressing misinformation without infringing on democratic values.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the shutdown of R/FIMI reflects ongoing debates about free speech and government intervention. As the US navigates this complex landscape, the balance between combating foreign disinformation and preserving free expression remains a critical challenge.

GOP Senator Quietly Challenges Trump’s Defense Agenda

Brent Edward
-
0
GOP Senator Quietly Challenges Trump’s Defense Agenda

Key Takeaways:

  • Senator Roger Wicker opposes some of Trump’s defense plans.
  • He supports higher defense spending and aid to Ukraine.
  • Wicker works with Democrats, gaining bipartisan support.
  • His strategies influence both the Pentagon and the White House.

Meet Senator Roger Wicker, the GOP Senator Quietly Challenging Trump’s Agenda—and Getting Away With It

In a political climate where aligning with President Trump is often crucial, one Republican senator is carving his own path. Senator Roger Wicker of Mississippi is making waves by challenging key parts of Trump’s defense agenda. Despite this, he’s avoided any backlash, showing how he’s strategically positioned himself as a powerful figure in Washington.

Walking a Fine Line

Senator Wicker, chair of the Armed Services Committee, has supported some of Trump’s most controversial decisions. For instance, he backed Pete Hegseth’s confirmation and defended Pentagon policies by blaming mid-level officials. Yet, he’s also stood up to Trump on issues like defense spending and Ukraine.

Wicker’s approach seems to work. He’s convinced Trump to increase defense spending to 5% of GDP, a boost that could push the defense budget over $1 trillion. This strategy has made both the Pentagon and the White House rely on him.

A Bipartisan Approach

Wicker’s stance on Ukraine sets him apart. While Trump considers better relations with Russia, Wicker strongly supports arming Ukraine and distrusts Putin. In February, he even criticized Hegseth for suggesting Ukraine couldn’t regain its borders or join NATO, calling it a “rookie mistake.”

Wicker also opposed cutting U.S. troops in Europe and South Korea and resisted the U.S. stepping down from leading NATO forces. These moves have earned him Democratic support, with Senator Richard Blumenthal praising his leadership and respect for differing views.

Why It Matters

Wicker’s ability to support Trump while challenging him highlights his strategic influence. His position makes him a crucial player in defense decisions, demonstrating how effective bipartisanship can be in shaping policy.

As Wicker continues to balance loyalty with independence, his actions show how one senator can impact major policies, proving that even in polarized times, leaders can make a difference without backlash.

Conclusion

Senator Wicker’s strategic navigation of Trump’s agenda is a lesson in political effectiveness. By working across the aisle and challenging when necessary, he’s become indispensable in Washington, shaping defense policies and earning respect from both parties. His approach shows that even in tough political environments, leaders can influence change without conflict.

Judge Warns Trump Admin: Fix Deportation Mess or Face Contempt

Brent Edward
-
0
Judge Warns Trump Admin: Fix Deportation Mess or Face Contempt

Key Takeaways:

  • A federal judge accused Trump’s administration of possibly contempt for defying a court order to stop deportation flights to El Salvador.
  • MSNBC’s Rachel Maddow highlighted the urgency, stating this could signal a serious threat to the rule of law.
  • The administration has one week to either bring deported individuals back or face criminal contempt charges.
  • Judge James Boasberg is demanding answers and has set a deadline for compliance.

Judge Warns Trump Admin: Fix Deportation Mess or Face Contempt

In a tense legal showdown, a federal judge has put the Trump administration on notice, warning of possible contempt of court over recent deportation flights to El Salvador. MSNBC’s Rachel Maddow broke down the situation, calling it a critical moment for the rule of law in the U.S.

What’s Happening?

Judge James Boasberg found that Trump officials may have disregarded his order to halt deportations, prompting him to consider holding them in contempt. Maddow emphasized the gravity of this, saying it’s a step toward undermining the justice system.

The Judge’s Ultimatum

The judge has given the administration a week to resolve the issue. They must either return deported individuals to the U.S. or provide names of officials involved, who could face contempt charges. Maddow noted that the judge is losing patience, signaling an end to delays.

Why This Matters

Contempt of court is serious, reflecting a disregard for legal authority. Maddow likened this situation to standing on the edge of a cliff, where ignoring court orders could erode trust in the justice system, affecting everyone.

What’s Next?

The administration’s response will be crucial. They must act quickly to avoid escalate the situation, which could lead to high-profile legal consequences. Maddow stressed that the nation is at a turning point, where respect for the law is essential.

This legal battle highlights the importance of upholding court orders and the potential risks of ignoring them. Stay tuned for updates as this situation unfolds.

Federal Appeals Court Blocks Biden Climate Funding Order

Brent Edward
-
0
Federal Appeals Court Blocks Biden Climate Funding Order

Key Takeaways:

  • A federal appeals court has paused a lower court’s ruling on climate funding.
  • The case involves billions in grants for green programs started under Biden.
  • The pause allows time to review the legal arguments.
  • Climate groups are fighting to keep the funds.

The D.C. Court of Appeals has stepped in to pause a ruling by U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan regarding climate funding. This move puts a temporary hold on billions of dollars in green grants tied to President Joe Biden’s climate initiative.

The case began when Judge Chutkan ruled that Citibank must release funds for climate programs that were previously pulled back by President Donald Trump’s administration. However, the appeals court wants more time to review the decision before it goes forward.

What Happened? Judge Chutkan’s ruling had stopped the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and its administrator, Lee Zeldin, from canceling or suspending the grants. These grants, totaling $14 million, were awarded to nonprofit climate groups in 2022.

But the appeals court felt that Judge Chutkan’s decision didn’t meet the required legal standards for issuing such an injunction. Now, the court is asking for more time to carefully consider the case before making a final decision.

A Controversial Program The grants were part of Biden’s climate plan, which aimed to support green initiatives across the country. However, the program has faced criticism. Administrator Lee Zeldin compared the grants to “gold bars being tossed off the Titanic,” suggesting that the money was being wasted. He also claimed the program was plagued by fraud.

Judge Chutkan, however, saw no evidence of fraud and ruled in favor of the climate groups. She stated that the funds were essential for their work and should not be taken away without justification.

Who’s Fighting for the Funds? The legal battle is being led by three nonprofit groups: the Climate United Fund, the Coalition for Green Capital, and Power Forward Communities. These organizations believe the funds are crucial for their efforts to combat climate change.

Their lawsuit against the EPA and Citibank aims to ensure the $14 million is released so they can continue their work. These groups argue that pulling back the funds would harm their ability to address environmental issues.

What’s Next? For now, the appeals court’s decision means the funds are on hold. The court will review the case to decide whether Judge Chutkan’s ruling was correct. If the appeals court sides with her decision, the funds will be released. If not, the grants could be canceled permanently.

This case highlights the ongoing political and legal battles over climate funding. It also shows how complex and controversial decisions about government money can be, especially when it comes to environmental programs.

As the court reviews the case, the nonprofit groups and supporters of the climate initiative are waiting anxiously. They hope the funds will be restored so they can continue their work toward a greener future.

In the meantime, the decision by the appeals court serves as a reminder of how the legal system can sometimes slow down progress, even when it comes to critical issues like climate change. Stay tuned for updates as this story continues to unfold.

Menendez Brothers Seek Reduced Sentences 35 Years After Murdering Parents

Brent Edward
-
0
Menendez Brothers Seek Reduced Sentences 35 Years After Murdering Parents

Key Takeaways:

  • Erik and Lyle Menendez, infamous for murdering their parents in 1989, are seeking reduced sentences in a Los Angeles court.
  • The brothers aim to have their life-without-parole sentences shortened, potentially allowing them to go free after 35 years.
  • Supporters argue they are reformed and deserve a second chance, while prosecutors insist they have not atoned for their crimes.
  • The case gained renewed attention after a Netflix series sparked public interest.
  • A two-day hearing begins Thursday to decide their fate.

The Menendez Brothers: A Case of Murder, Money, and Controversy

Erik and Lyle Menendez, two of America’s most notorious murderers, are back in the spotlight. This week, they’ll appear in a Los Angeles courtroom to ask a judge to reduce their life sentences for the brutal killings of their parents, Jose and Kitty Menendez, over three decades ago.

The brothers were convicted in the 1990s of murdering their wealthy parents with shotguns in their Beverly Hills home. Prosecutors argued at the time that the brothers killed their parents to inherit their $14 million fortune. The case shocked the nation, not only because of the brutal nature of the crime but also because of the brothers’ changing stories about what happened.

Initially, the brothers claimed their parents were victims of a mafia hit. But later, during their trials, they said they acted in self-defense, accusing their father of emotional, physical, and sexual abuse. They claimed they feared Jose Menendez would kill them if they didn’t strike first.

A Campaign for Freedom

Over the years, the brothers have built a network of supporters who believe they deserve a second chance. Their campaign gained momentum after a popular Netflix documentary series, Monsters: The Lyle and Erik Menendez Story, reignited public interest in the case.

Supporters argue that Erik, 54, and Lyle, 57, have been model prisoners, behaving well behind bars and showing signs of rehabilitation. They also point to a former Los Angeles prosecutor who recently supported reducing their sentences.

However, not everyone is on their side. Los Angeles District Attorney Nathan Hochman believes the brothers have not taken full responsibility for their crimes. He accuses them of continuing to lie about the murders and shows no remorse.

The Prosecution’s Case: Premeditation and Deception

Prosecutors argue that the brothers planned the murders in advance, even setting up alibis to avoid suspicion. After the killings, they allegedly tried to cover their tracks by persuading others to lie for them.

Hochman also points out the brutal nature of the crime: Jose and Kitty Menendez were shot multiple times, including in the knees, indicating premeditation and a desire to inflict suffering.

The district attorney believes these factors, along with the brothers’ refusal to fully admit to their crimes, make them unfit for parole.

The Upcoming Hearing

The brothers’ hearing is set to begin on Thursday and could last up to two days. Their lawyers will argue that they have changed and deserve a chance at freedom. However, Judge Michael Jesic has already rejected one effort by the prosecution to drop the resentencing motion, signaling that the hearing will move forward.

The Menendez case has always been controversial. While some believe the brothers were victims of abuse who acted in desperation, others see them as calculated killers who got what they deserved.

What’s Next?

The outcome of this hearing could change the course of the brothers’ lives. If the judge rules in their favor, they might one day leave prison and start new lives. If not, they could spend the rest of their days behind bars.

As the case unfolds, the debate over justice, rehabilitation, and second chances will likely spark even more discussion. For now, all eyes are on Los Angeles as the Menendez brothers take another step in their fight for freedom.

The case of the Menendez brothers remains a stark reminder of how crime, family dysfunction, and the pursuit of forgiveness can captivate and divide society. As the hearing approaches, the nation waits to see if the brothers will get another chance—or if their past will forever define their future.

Peace Activists Protest Military Spending, Call for Social Services Funding

Brent Edward
-
0
Peace Activists Protest Military Spending, Call for Social Services Funding

Key Takeaways:

  • Dozens of peace activists protested outside the Lower Manhattan IRS Office on Tax Day.
  • They called for redirecting federal funds from military spending to social services like healthcare and education.
  • The Trump administration has cut jobs and funding for key agencies, including Health and Human Services, Education, and the EPA.
  • Activists highlighted the U.S. military budget, which is the largest in the world, and its role in global conflicts.

Activists Speak Out Against Military Spending

On Tax Day, as millions rushed to file their taxes, a group of peace activists gathered outside the Lower Manhattan IRS Office. They were there to protest the massive amount of taxpayer money going toward military spending, while social services like healthcare and education face deep cuts.

Groups like Brooklyn for Peace, the War Resisters League, and Move the Money-NYC joined the demonstration. They called for a shift in federal spending priorities, arguing that taxes should fund programs that improve people’s lives, not fuel endless wars.

Federal Budget Cuts Hit Hard

In recent months, the Trump administration has made drastic cuts, affecting over 200,000 public workers. Agencies like the Department of Health and Human Services, the Department of Education, and the Environmental Protection Agency have been hit the hardest. These cuts have left many Americans worried about the future of vital services.

Tom Gogin, from Move the Money NYC, explained, “Our taxes should pay for things like schools, healthcare, and housing. These are the things that help people live decently. But instead, too much of our money is spent on bombs, drones, and guns. It’s stealing from us.”

The Cost of War

The U.S. spends more on its military than any other country. For the 2025 fiscal year, the military budget is $895 billion, and President Trump has proposed a $1 trillion military budget for 2026. Activists argue that this money comes at the expense of social programs that benefit everyday Americans.

The U.S. military budget also funds conflicts abroad. For example, in the last year alone, the U.S. sent over $17.9 billion to Israel, which activists say has contributed to violence against Palestinians in Gaza.

Tax Resistance as a Form of Protest

For some activists, refusing to pay taxes is a way to protest military spending. Alice Sturn Sutter, a nurse who has been resisting war taxes since the 1980s, said, “We’re paying for genocide in Palestine and building prisons. It’s horrible, and we’re all part of it as taxpayers. Withholding taxes is a way to take responsibility and protest.”

Ruth Benn, another activist, has refused to pay her federal taxes for decades. She admitted that the amount she withholds may seem small, but she believes widespread tax resistance could challenge the military-industrial complex.

Why Tax Day Matters

The War Resisters League estimates that 50% of income taxes in the 2026 fiscal year will go toward military spending and interest on past military debts. Activists say Tax Day is a powerful moment to question where our money goes.

Benn said, “If more people refuse to pay taxes for war, it could make a difference. They don’t want people thinking about this. They want us to pay without questioning.”

The Fight Continues

As the protest outside the IRS Office showed, activists are determined to keep pushing for change. They believe that by redirecting funds from the military to social services, the U.S. can build a more just and peaceful society.

For now, the fight continues. Whether through protests, tax resistance, or advocating for policy change, these activists are making their voices heard.

Support Independent Journalism

The Indypendent is a reader-funded news organization. To support our work, you can make a donation or subscribe to our newsletter. Follow us for more stories like this.

1...956957958...2,363Page 957 of 2,363

Explore

Trending

Follow us

© All Rights Reserved, Newspaper Theme.