Key Takeaways:
– After the Berlin Wall fell, NATO added 14 countries east of Berlin despite an understanding not to advance eastward.
– Russia feels threatened by numerous U.S. military bases in NATO countries, aimed towards them.
– Historical events such as the Zimmermann Telegram during WWI, and the Cuban Missile Crisis demonstrate the dangerous potential of armed alliances close to home.
– President Biden’s policy towards Ukraine has escalated tensions, seemingly contributing to Russia’s invasion.
– Both the U.S. and Russia are using controversial weaponry in Ukraine, bypassing international laws and treaties.
– The question arises: Who benefits from this conflict? Potential culprits include war profiteering companies and the CIA.
Understanding NATO’s Eastward Expansion
In the aftermath of the Berlin Wall’s fall, promises were made between the West and Russia stating NATO would not move eastward of Berlin. Breaking the understanding, NATO went ahead to incorporate 14 eastern countries. Without any formal agreement guiding these expansions, Russia now perceives an increasing threat – not just due to NATO’s growth, but more from the equipped US military bases within these countries, and their chiefly west-aimed arsenal.
Historical Lessons: Foreign Alliances and Their Implications
Looking into the past, events like WWI’s Zimmermann Telegram, which proposed a German-Mexican alliance against the U.S., and the Cuban Missile Crisis, involving Soviet missiles close to US borders, underscore how having military bases and alliances on one’s borders can be a catalyst for conflict.
Russia’s hand of caution towards NATO’s eastward expansions and U.S.’s extensive military presence becomes easier to understand when one takes these historical incidences into account.
An Unsettled Orthodox Divide
Adding to the present complexities is the long-standing divide of Western and Eastern Orthodox Churches. It’s noteworthy that the Western Orthodox Church, in the Fourth Crusade of 1204, led an offensive against Eastern Orthodoxy resulting in Constantinople’s destruction. Unhealed by Pope John Paul II’s 2004 formal apology, it adds to Putin’s suspicion towards the West. A peace endeavor by Pope Francis, however, brings a speck of hope.
Ukraine, NATO, and US: A Tangle of Distrust and Aggression
The Biden administration’s approach to the Ukraine conundrum has been precarious. Turning a deaf ear to Putin’s concerns over Ukraine’s NATO membership aspirations led to the unsettling massing of Russian troops on the Ukrainian border. The following threats by Vice President Harris led to a domino effect resulting in Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. However, Biden’s subsequent disapproval of Ukraine’s readiness for NATO membership leaves one wondering if this crisis could have been averted.
War or War Crime: Weapons and Their Controversy
Keeping all international objection and legal agreements aside, both U.S. and Russia have been deploying cluster bombs in Ukraine, which are deemed war crimes by human rights groups due to their high civilian fatality rates. In further escalations, President Biden has allowed Ukraine to launch long-range missiles into Russia and is now supplying anti-personnel land mines, which had been pledged against earlier.
Finding The Puppeteers of The Ukrainian Crisis
Biden’s actions in Ukraine scenes have been controversial and aggressive. However, the query stands, is it really Biden or Harris who are driving this conflict? Or could it be war profiteering companies, who make considerable donations to political campaigns, or even the CIA with its intricate history in Ukraine. Determining who stands to gain the most from this situation is an imperative task that could potentially reveal the battlefield’s unseen puppet master.
In all, the conflict in Ukraine is a complex web of history, geopolitical alignments, and hidden profits. The world can only hope a practical and humane resolution can be found before more lives are lost.