Key takeaways
– Candace Owens says Trump betrayed his MAGA base by blocking Epstein file release
– She claims Israeli leader controls Trump on Gaza issues
– Owens argues Trump joined the deep state rather than fighting it
– She criticizes Maxwell’s transfer to a low security prison
– Owens feels Trump abandoned his supporters on free speech
Introduction
Right wing commentator Candace Owens stepped away from supporting former president Donald Trump. During a talk with radio host Alex Jones, she argued that Trump turned against his own voters. Owens pointed to his refusal to share files on Jeffrey Epstein as proof. She also claimed another world leader now calls the shots in the White House.
Owens’s Epstein File Criticism
Owens said Trump did not live up to his promise to expose deep state secrets. She argued that clearing up doubts about Epstein would show real courage. However, she noted that Trump instead dodged the issue. In her view, he intentionally ignored the calls for transparency. Owens believes this move hurt his fight against hidden power structures.
Furthermore, she described Trump’s public message on the matter as a slap in the face. She noted that he told his followers he did not want them anymore if they pushed for Epstein file release. Owens called that approach unreasonable and unfair. Consequently, she lost faith in his commitment to free speech.
Netanyahu’s Influence Over Trump
Next, Owens turned to the war in Gaza. She claimed Trump sees the conflict as no big deal. In her words, he pretends everything is fine. From there, she jumped to a bold conclusion. Owens argued that Netanyahu now runs US policy in that region. She said the Israeli leader holds real power over Trump.
Moreover, Owens linked her Epstein argument to this idea of outside control. She sees a pattern of Trump avoiding tough stands once they clash with Netanyahu’s interests. According to her, this shift reveals who truly calls the shots in Washington.
Deep State Accusations
Owens used her platform to charge Trump with joining the very network he once fought. Back when he campaigned, she believed he would break down secret government cells. Yet now she insists he has become part of them. For Owens, that change shows betrayal.
She stressed that Trump needs to admit what happened. She wants him to explain why he chose silence over revealing Epstein’s ties. In her view, true leaders face down power no matter the risks. Since Trump stepped back, she argues, he lost his moral edge.
Maxwell Prison Transfer Concerns
The debate then shifted to Ghislaine Maxwell. Owens criticized the decision to move her to a low security prison. She pointed out that her new home might be nicer than many average houses. That fact shocked her. She suggested it proved a weakness in the justice system.
Owens feels that Maxwell’s transfer could hide deeper secrets. She called it another sign of special treatment for people tied to powerful figures. Because of this, she worries that true justice may never surface.
Questions on Epstein Funding and Trump
During the conversation, Owens floated a bold theory. She suggested that Epstein may have funded Trump’s ventures at some point. In her view, that link might explain Trump’s hesitation to hand over files. She mentioned past events like beauty pageants to hint at possible ties.
She asked whether Trump really wanted to protect his own image or keep certain names hidden. By raising this question, she aimed to cast doubt on his motives. This line of thought underpins her claim that external interests shape his actions today.
Impact on MAGA Supporters
Owens made a clear point about party loyalty. She said supporters did not leave Trump. Instead, he turned his back on them. She argued that his silence on Epstein files equaled a refusal to back free speech.
For Owens, this move spelled betrayal. She encouraged fellow MAGA voters to rethink their stance. She warned that blind loyalty can lead to disappointment. Moreover, she urged them to demand transparency from every leader.
Conclusion
Candace Owens surprised many by distancing herself from Trump. She used her platform to highlight what she sees as his major missteps. From refusing to share Epstein files to following another nation’s lead, she laid out her case. In the end, Owens called on her peers to hold their leaders accountable, no matter their party.
Her remarks show a split in conservative ranks over Trump’s next steps. As the former president weighs another campaign bid, these doubts may grow louder. Finally, Owens’s accusations underscore the power of transparency in politics. She believes that without it, true change remains out of reach.