Key takeaways
- House Speaker Mike Johnson says furloughed workers should get back pay.
- President Trump argued some workers don’t deserve missed pay.
- Johnson cites federal law and long-standing custom on back pay.
- Back pay has become a bargaining chip in shutdown talks.
Mike Johnson Stands Firm on Back Pay
House Speaker Mike Johnson broke with President Trump on whether to pay furloughed workers their missed wages. He told reporters that paying back pay is “of course” the way Congress has always worked. In fact, federal law has “always been pretty settled on that,” he said. Moreover, Johnson noted it is custom that furloughed employees receive full back pay when the government reopens. This stance sets him apart from Trump’s more hardline views.
Shutdown Talks Turn on Back Pay Dispute
The fight over back pay has become a key point in shutdown negotiations. President Trump used it as leverage to pressure Democrats to back a funding bill. Meanwhile, a memo from the Office of Management and Budget argued that workers weren’t automatically entitled to back pay. Trump administration officials even blamed Democrats for the shutdown, saying it “would not have happened” if they approved a clean continuing resolution. Nevertheless, Johnson insists workers must be made whole.
Why Back Pay Matters to Workers
Furloughed federal employees face a sudden drop in income when the government shuts down. However, most still have to pay rent, bills, and buy food. Therefore, back pay is essential to help them catch up once the shutdown ends. Without it, many would struggle to cover basic expenses. Moreover, knowing they will get back pay gives workers peace of mind during a shutdown. Otherwise, stress and uncertainty would rise.
Federal Law and Custom on Back Pay
Under federal law, agencies typically issue back pay to furloughed staff. For decades, Congress has always approved funds to cover missed paychecks. In addition, a long-standing custom supports this practice. Johnson pointed out that this tradition protects employees from political fights. Even when leaders disagree on budgets, workers receive the wages they earned. Thus, back pay has become a nonpartisan issue in many prior shutdowns.
Trump’s Hardline Approach
Recently, President Trump said some furloughed workers “don’t deserve” to receive any missed payments. His comments surprised many, since back pay was once noncontroversial. Moreover, administration officials circulated a memo arguing the law isn’t clear on entitlement. This shift has fueled debate among Republicans. Some lawmakers fear using back pay as a bargaining tool hurts worker morale and public trust.
Political Chess in Washington
In political terms, back pay has become a pawn on the negotiation board. The White House insists back pay can wait until after funding is approved. On the other hand, Democrats and moderate Republicans see back pay as nonnegotiable. Therefore, the standoff over back pay deepens the shutdown. Meanwhile, hundreds of thousands of federal employees remain furloughed. The impasse shows how a single issue can sway major budget talks.
Impact on Federal Workers
Thousands of federal workers have now missed paychecks. Many worry about paying rent, mortgages, and student loans. In addition, they still face daily expenses like groceries and gas. Consequently, anxiety rises in households across the country. Some workers have taken second jobs or relied on savings to make ends meet. That makes the promise of back pay more urgent than ever.
Public Perception and Media Reaction
News outlets have focused on the back pay battle as a key shutdown drama. Polls show most Americans believe furloughed workers should get their missed pay. Moreover, public support for paying back pay remains strong across party lines. Therefore, lawmakers may risk backlash by opposing it. Johnson’s clear stance on back pay could win him praise from both sides.
Possible Paths to Resolution
One possible solution is a clean funding bill that includes back pay language. This could reopen the government and guarantee payments. Alternatively, leaders might pass a separate bill just to cover back pay. However, that option seems unlikely without a broader agreement. Finally, lawmakers could reach a compromise by adding conditions to back pay. Yet, any delay would keep workers in limbo.
The Road Ahead
For now, the shutdown continues as back pay battles rage on. Johnson’s public break with Trump highlights internal GOP divisions. At the same time, Democratic leaders push for a swift end that ensures back pay. In the coming days, both sides will need to decide if they value worker security over political gains. Ultimately, the fate of back pay may determine when the government reopens.
FAQs
How does back pay work for furloughed workers?
Back pay means paying employees for the days they worked but did not get paid during a shutdown. Congress usually approves funds to cover those unpaid wages once the shutdown ends.
Can Congress force back pay?
Yes. Congress holds the power to pass laws that guarantee back pay. In past shutdowns, lawmakers have always approved payments to protect workers.
Why is back pay controversial now?
The Trump administration argued that workers aren’t automatically entitled to back pay. Using it as leverage in budget talks turned a routine practice into a political issue.
What happens if back pay isn’t approved?
Without back pay, furloughed workers would lose income for the shutdown period. They might face financial hardship paying bills and living expenses.