Key Takeaways

• Representative Cory Mills faces a restraining order filed by his ex-girlfriend.
• Lindsey Langston, Miss United States, said he threatened to release private videos.
• A judge ruled Mills’s story about a damaged phone largely untrue.
• The order bars any contact or public mention of Langston.

Representative Cory Mills has been legally ordered to stay away from Lindsey Langston. Langston is Miss United States and a Republican state committeewoman. She asked for the order in August after Mills allegedly kept harassing her. After two court hearings, Judge Fred Koberlein decided Langston could face more harm without the order. Now, Mills must not contact her or talk about her online.

What Led to the Restraining Order Against Cory Mills

First, Langston said Mills threatened her reputation. She feared he would share private videos of them together. Moreover, she claimed emotional pressure and threats of future violence. Then in August, she filed for protection in a Florida court. Langston told the judge she felt unsafe around Mills. Consequently, the judge held a hearing to review evidence from both sides.

Allegations of Harassment and Threats

Langston described a pattern of aggressive messages and phone calls. She said Mills even threatened to strip her of her Miss United States crown. “He warned me I’d lose my title if I spoke up,” Langston said. Furthermore, she claimed he hinted at harming anyone she dated. She added that these threats grew more intense over time. Thus, she felt she could no longer ignore the danger.

Judge’s Findings and Ruling

Judge Koberlein found “reasonable cause” to believe Langston faced dating violence. He labeled many of Mills’s explanations “incomprehensible.” For instance, Mills said his phone holding intimate images was damaged. The judge did not buy that story. Instead, he ruled that Mills’s testimony was largely false. As a result, Mills must not contact Langston in person or online. He cannot even refer to her on social media.

After the Order: Continued Contact Attempts

Despite the court’s clear order, Mills tried to reach Langston. He asked a congressional staffer to message her. Then he used another girlfriend’s phone to call Langston. When she blocked his number, Mills called her family. These actions showed the judge why strict enforcement was needed. Now any violation could lead to harsher legal penalties.

What This Means for Dating Violence and Public Figures

This case highlights the risk of digital harassment in relationships. Moreover, it shows how public figures can misuse power. Langston is both a beauty queen and a party official. Mills is a U.S. representative with influence. Their dispute raises questions about accountability in elected office. Ultimately, the court’s decision sends a message: intimidation is not acceptable.

Understanding Restraining Orders in Simple Terms

A restraining order is a legal tool to protect someone from harm. When a judge grants it, the accused must avoid any contact. They also cannot mention the protected person publicly. Violating this order can lead to fines or jail time. Thus, restraining orders keep people safe when they face threats.

Looking Ahead for Cory Mills and Lindsey Langston

As the order stands, both parties must follow the judge’s rules. Mills cannot reach or discuss Langston under penalty of law. Langston can pursue her duties without fear of harassment. The case may reshape how public figures handle personal disputes. Finally, it serves as a reminder that courts can intervene to stop dating violence.

Frequently Asked Questions

What happens if Cory Mills breaks the restraining order?

If he breaks it, he could face fines, arrest, or criminal charges depending on the violation.

Can Langston lift the restraining order if she wants?

Yes. She may request to end it, but a judge must approve that change.

Do restraining orders apply on social media too?

Absolutely. This order specifically bars any online mention or contact.

Are intimate videos protected under revenge porn laws?

Many states ban sharing private sexual content without consent. Legal penalties vary by location.