Key Takeaways

• President Trump said he wants to restart U.S. nuclear tests.
• He claimed rivals are catching up on weapons.
• Experts say his facts about stockpiles and tests are wrong.
• Critics warn testing could help enemies more than the U.S.

Trump Orders Nuclear Test Restart

On Truth Social, President Trump announced a plan to resume a nuclear test. He said the U.S. must test on an “equal basis” because other countries are already doing so. This surprised many experts who point out that no nation except North Korea has tested nukes since the 1990s. They also say his claims about stockpiles and updates are false.

Trump’s Surprising Claim on Nuclear Test

In his post, Trump wrote that the U.S. has the most nuclear weapons. He said he “hated” updating them, but had no choice. He added that Russia is second and China will catch up within five years. He then ordered the Defense Department to start testing existing bombs again. He called his agency the “Department of War” and said tests would begin immediately.

Expert Critics Question Nuclear Test Order

Tom Nichols, a retired professor at the U.S. Naval War College, quickly called out every part of Trump’s message. He noted that Russia’s stockpile is actually larger by a small margin. He also pointed out that Trump did not build a bigger arsenal in his first term through renovations. Finally, Nichols reminded everyone that only North Korea has tested a nuclear device since the 1990s. In short, no one else is testing.

Why Testing Matters

Testing nuclear bombs is a big deal. It can show the world that a nation can still make its weapons work the way it wants. Yet, testing also comes with risks. It can trigger a new arms race. It can harm the environment. It can break international norms. The last full-scale U.S. test happened nearly thirty years ago. Since then, the U.S. has used simulations to check its warheads.

Expert Warns of Unintended Consequences

Beth Sanner, former deputy director of national intelligence, spoke about the plan on a cable news program. She said allowing a renewed nuclear test would help rival nations more than the U.S. She explained that once testing restarts, other countries could expand their programs freely. Thus, adversaries would gain more than we would, she argued.

Nuclear Test Restart Could Change Global Balance

If the U.S. truly begins a nuclear test again, it could shift world power. Nations that paused their programs might feel pressure to test more. Even allies could reconsider treaties that limit tests. Moreover, international bodies might condemn the move. As a result, global tension could rise fast.

How We Got Here

During his first term, Trump ordered a major overhaul of existing weapons. He claimed this built up the U.S. stockpile. Yet, official data shows that the U.S. arsenal did not outgrow Russia’s. In fact, both sides have cut back since the Cold War. Treaties like New START limit warhead numbers. Yet, in February, the U.S. withdrew from a key treaty on midrange missiles. That exit has already raised concerns about a new arms race.

What Could Happen Next

Following the announcement, the Pentagon must figure out how to conduct a nuclear test safely. It would need to pick a test site. It would need to ensure environmental checks. It would also need to coordinate with scientists. All of this could take years. Yet, Trump’s message said the process would begin immediately. The gap between words and action could be wide.

Public Reaction and Political Stakes

Citizens and lawmakers reacted in many ways. Some praised Trump’s push for strong defense. Others warned that testing could cost billions and harm U.S. standing abroad. Senators from both parties have asked the Defense Department for a clear plan and cost estimate. Meanwhile, some groups have called for renewed treaties to ban tests forever.

Could Congress Stop a Nuclear Test?

Yes. Congress controls spending. If lawmakers refuse to fund any test, the plan can stall. Several senior lawmakers have expressed doubts about allocating money. Still, the president can direct agencies to start planning. Without funds, actual testing cannot happen. Thus, the political fight over budgets is key.

International Response

Other nations will watch closely. China and Russia could use the U.S. move to justify their own programs. Some of their leaders have already said they would “take countermeasures.” European allies may also voice concern. They worry that a nuclear test could weaken global nonproliferation efforts.

The Future of Nuclear Test Bans

For decades, a moratorium on nuclear testing has stood as a norm. The Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty, while not fully in force, has wide support. Many see testing as reckless and outdated. Restarting tests would shatter that norm. Then, future leaders might find it easier to launch new weapons without constraints.

What Does This Mean for Deterrence?

Deterrence rests on the idea that no one will risk attacking you. If every country tests its nukes, trust erodes. Allies might doubt U.S. protection. Adversaries might feel more brave. In addition, testing is only one measure of strength. Diplomatic ties, conventional forces, and cyber defense all matter too.

Moving Forward

At this stage, it remains unclear how fast the U.S. can stage a nuclear test. Planning alone could take months. In the meantime, expert voices will keep pushing back. They will offer data on stockpiles, treaties, and risks. They will also remind the public that testing may do more harm than good.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is a nuclear test?

A nuclear test is when a country detonates a nuclear device to measure its power and reliability. Full tests involve actual explosions. Subcritical tests use non-nuclear materials to study weapon parts without a blast.

Why did the U.S. stop nuclear tests?

The U.S. paused tests in the early 1990s. Leaders feared health risks, environmental damage, and a new arms race. Since then, the U.S. has relied on simulations and limited, non-explosive tests.

How do other countries respond?

Most nations welcomed the U.S. test moratorium. They signed treaties to ban tests too. Only North Korea has defied these rules and carried out nuclear blasts since 1998.

What could restart nuclear tests cost?

Studies suggest a full-scale test could cost hundreds of millions of dollars. The total cost depends on site preparations, scientific work, safety measures, and environmental cleanup.