Key Takeaways

• President Trump denies U.S. support for Ukraine’s use of long-range missiles.
• The Wall Street Journal reported a policy shift letting Ukraine strike targets inside Russia.
• Control over these weapons moved from the Pentagon to U.S. European Command.
• Trump labeled the story “fake news” on his social platform.
• The debate highlights growing tensions over U.S. aid and Ukraine’s defense strategy.

Why Trump Denies Long-Range Missiles Claim

President Trump strongly rejected a recent news report. The Wall Street Journal said the U.S. secretly let Ukraine use long-range missiles inside Russia. But Trump insists the story is false. He claims the U.S. played no role in supplying or approving those weapons. The argument has stirred fresh debate about U.S. policy toward Ukraine.

The Long-Range Missiles Debate

In recent weeks, the Wall Street Journal published a detailed story. It said the Trump administration lifted a key restriction. This change allows Ukraine to carry out deeper strikes against Russian targets. The move, according to the report, aims to pressure the Kremlin and slow its advances.

What the Wall Street Journal Report Says

The Journal explained that the U.S. quietly approved Ukraine’s use of long-range missiles. Previously, American policy barred them from hitting Russian soil.
Moreover, the report noted a shift in decision power. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth once held authority over these strikes. Now that role belongs to General Alexus Grynkewich at U.S. European Command. He also commands NATO forces in Europe. As a result, Ukraine can now receive direct approval for deep-strike missions.

Trump’s Response on Truth Social

President Trump took to his social media platform to respond. He wrote that the Journal’s account is “fake news.” Trump said the U.S. has no connection to those missiles. He added that Ukraine’s actions and weapons come from other sources.
In addition, Trump accused the media of spreading misinformation. He asked followers to ignore the report and trust his version of events. His bold denial has fueled more questions about the actual policy.

How U.S. Policy on Long-Range Missiles Changed

Before this report, official U.S. policy banned Ukraine from using American-supplied missiles on Russian territory. The goal was to avoid a wider war. However, Ukrainian leaders pressed for stronger support as their forces faced heavy pressure. They argued that deeper strikes could disrupt Russian supply lines and slow attacks.
Therefore, U.S. officials began debating whether to grant new authority. They weighed risks of escalation against the need to strengthen Ukraine’s defense. Ultimately, the decision shifted from the Pentagon to U.S. European Command. This move created a streamlined approval process.

Why the Shift Matters

First, giving Ukraine more missile reach shows stronger U.S. backing. Second, it pressures Russia on multiple fronts. Third, it signals to allies that the U.S. remains committed to Ukraine’s security. However, opponents worry it could spark retaliation from Moscow. They fear a broader conflict if Russia views strikes inside its borders as a direct threat.

Analysts Weigh In

Many experts say this change could tilt the battlefield in Ukraine’s favor. They note that long-range missiles can hit supply hubs far behind enemy lines. This could force Russia to divert resources.
However, some caution that any strike inside Russia risks escalation. They remind readers that wars often spiral out of control. Consequently, the U.S. must act carefully to balance support with restraint.

What Comes Next

Moving forward, two things will shape this story. First, Ukraine’s choices on where and how to use these missiles. They must balance military gain with diplomatic risk. Second, Russia’s response. Will Moscow retaliate or seek a ceasefire? Both sides now watch closely.
Meanwhile, President Trump’s denial keeps the debate heated. His claim of “fake news” contrasts sharply with the Journal’s detailed account. Americans and allies await further clarity from official U.S. channels.

Why This Matters to You

This dispute affects global security and U.S. leadership. It could redefine how far America will go to support allies. In addition, it shows the power of media and politics in shaping public view. Whether you follow foreign policy or media battles, this story has real-world impact.

FAQs

What did the Wall Street Journal report claim?

The Wall Street Journal said the U.S. lifted restrictions. This change lets Ukraine use long-range missiles inside Russia. The goal was to tighten pressure on the Kremlin.

How did President Trump respond?

Trump called the story “fake news” on his social media platform. He denied any U.S. involvement in those missile strikes.

Who now approves Ukraine’s missile strikes?

Control moved from Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth to General Alexus Grynkewich. He leads U.S. European Command and NATO forces in Europe.

Why are long-range missiles important?

Long-range missiles can reach targets far behind enemy lines. They help disrupt supply routes and weaken enemy advances. However, they also carry a risk of broader conflict.