13.6 C
Los Angeles
Monday, November 17, 2025

Project 2026: How to Revive Our Republic

Key Takeaways Independent author Mike Bedenbaugh presents...

Why McDonald’s Prices Are Driving Low-Income Customers Away

Key takeaways Fast food prices at McDonald’s...

Trump Attack Sparks Outrage: Insult to Massie’s Late Wife

Key Takeaways President Trump’s online jab at...

Trump Claims Drug Strikes Don’t Need Congress

Breaking NewsTrump Claims Drug Strikes Don’t Need Congress

Key takeaways:

  • President Trump says he does not need Congress approval for drug strikes.
  • His team has carried out at least 21 drug strikes, killing about 90 people.
  • Officials have shared little proof that these attacks hit only drug runners.
  • Legal experts worry the drug strikes may break international law.

Trump’s Drug Strikes Claim Stirs Debate

President Trump stunned reporters by saying he orders drug strikes without Congress OK. He spoke after arriving at Palm Beach International Airport. So far, his administration has launched at least 21 drug strikes in international waters. Around 90 people died. His team says these strikes target drug runners. However, the White House has shown almost no proof of that claim.

What Trump Actually Said

Trump said he told Secretary of State Marco Rubio to keep Congress informed. Yet, he also made clear he does not need Congress approval. “We like to keep Congress involved,” he said. “But we don’t need their approval.” He added that stopping drugs from Mexico or Venezuela justifies acting on his own. In his view, letting legislators know is helpful. But waiting for a yes is not.

He spoke to reporters while walking off Air Force One. A journalist asked if he plans to discuss options on Venezuela with Congress. Trump replied that he already told Rubio to tell lawmakers about these drug strikes. He argued that Congress would support them anyway.

Congress Role in Drug Strikes Explained

Congress holds the power to declare war or authorize military action. In the Constitution, lawmakers must approve major uses of force. Yet, presidents often rely on a law called the Authorization for Use of Military Force. That 2001 law gives the president broad power against terrorists. Still, experts say it does not clearly allow attacks on boats in international waters for drug control.

Moreover, the administration has refused to arrest some survivors of these attacks. That has raised fresh legal doubts. Critics point out that international law protects all people at sea. Stopping a vessel requires a clear legal basis. Otherwise, it could count as an act of war.

Counting the Drug Strikes

Since early this year, the administration carried out at least 21 known drug strikes. They hit small boats thought to carry cocaine, meth, or other drugs. Officials believe these vessels head toward the United States. American special forces or naval teams destroy them before they reach land. In total, about 90 people died and some boats sank completely.

Yet, very few survivors were arrested afterward. The Pentagon says it will review each case. Critics demand to see the evidence tying each boat to a drug cartel. So far, the White House has shared almost no details. Without proof, some worry innocent sailors could have died.

Experts Question Legality

Legal scholars say any military strike must follow U.S. and international law. Attacking ships on the high seas usually needs permission from the ship’s flag nation. Alternatively, it must qualify as self-defense. Critics argue these drug strikes lack both.

One expert notes that killing people without capturing them hurts the rule of law. Another points out that non-combatants could be on board. Moreover, the refusal to detain survivors deepens the legal confusion. As a result, Congress members feel shut out of a major national security move.

Trump’s order to keep Congress informed may soothe some worries. However, many lawmakers say they deserve real oversight, not just a memo. They want to see evidence and debate the legal justification.

What Comes Next

Lawmakers could push for hearings or demand documents. They might introduce a bill that limits the president’s ability to order more drug strikes. Meanwhile, the administration seems set on continuing its campaign. Trump insists the strikes keep dangerous drugs from reaching U.S. streets.

If Congress challenges the strikes, a legal fight could land in federal court. Judges would then weigh the president’s war powers against Congressional authority. That could shape U.S. policy on drug enforcement at sea for years.

Conclusion

President Trump’s claim that he can launch drug strikes without Congress approval has sparked a heated debate. While his team says these actions curb dangerous drug flows, critics worry about legality and oversight. In the coming months, Congress may push back. The outcome could change how the U.S. fights the drug trade at sea.

FAQs

Why does Trump say he can order drug strikes without Congress?

He believes stopping drugs is a key executive power. He also cites broad war powers and past authorizations.

How many drug strikes have taken place so far?

At least 21 known strikes have occurred in international waters. Officials report around 90 people died.

What legal concerns surround these drug strikes?

Experts worry the strikes lack proper congressional approval and may violate international law on the high seas.

Could Congress stop these drug strikes?

Yes. Lawmakers could hold hearings, pass new laws, or challenge the strikes in federal court.

Check out our other content

Most Popular Articles