Key Takeaways
• Mary Trump warns that the new National Security Strategy sidelines the EU and democracy promotion.
• The plan allows Russian influence to grow and blocks Ukraine’s NATO membership.
• European leaders fear a break from the post–World War II order.
• Kremlin voices cheer the shift, calling it a step that matches Russia’s goals.
• U.S. voters can change leaders but cannot undo the global impact once set in motion.
How the National Security Strategy shifts America’s global role
President Trump’s newest National Security Strategy puts the United States at odds with its European allies. In this plan, the U.S. steps back from defending democracy abroad. It also signals no pushback against Russian influence campaigns. Moreover, it offers no support for Ukraine joining NATO. As a result, the strategy marks a sharp turn away from decades of cooperation with the EU.
Psychologist and author Mary Trump, President Trump’s niece, issued a stark warning. She said the document signals a U.S. withdrawal from the post–World War II order. Mary Trump argues that her uncle and his allies aim to turn America into an “autocratic regime.” She notes that current Republican leaders in Congress share this vision. Therefore, she believes this shift will have deep, lasting effects.
Europe’s reaction to the National Security Strategy
European officials have expressed alarm at the plan. They see it as an attack on values the U.S. once championed. One former Swedish prime minister said the strategy’s language about Europe hints at “civilizational erasure.” He compared its tone to views on the extreme right. This claim outraged many in the EU, where unity and democracy remain top priorities.
In response, some EU members say they may need to develop their own defense capabilities. They fear that they can no longer rely on American leadership. Consequently, talks about creating a stronger European army have gained new momentum. Yet building such a force could take years and face political hurdles. In the meantime, Europe must decide how to fill the security void.
Why Russia welcomes the National Security Strategy
Unsurprisingly, Russia’s government celebrated the move. Kremlin officials said the changes align with Russia’s own vision for Europe. They view a weaker American role as a victory. Thus, they hope to expand their influence across the continent without fear of U.S. intervention. Russian leaders believe a retreating America will allow them to redraw borders and sway public opinion.
According to Mary Trump, Russia’s joy highlights the risks of the strategy. She warns that giving Moscow free rein threatens both stability and democracy in Europe. Moreover, she points out that once the U.S. pulls back, it may never fully return to its previous role. She fears this could embolden other autocratic regimes elsewhere.
The broader shift in global democracy
The National Security Strategy not only affects Europe. It also signals a change in how America views its role worldwide. For decades, the U.S. saw itself as a champion of democracy. It supported free elections, human rights, and rule of law. Yet under this new policy, those goals take a back seat to other priorities.
Furthermore, Mary Trump argues that this approach reflects President Trump’s personal values. She says he cares little for democratic ideals. Instead, she believes he seeks power and favors leaders who mirror his style. So, when American policy no longer promotes democracy, the world feels that loss. Countries struggling to break away from dictatorships may lose hope of U.S. backing.
Europe will remember this moment
Mary Trump issues a final warning: this shift will shape how Europe views America for generations. She notes that American voters can remove President Trump and his party from power. Nevertheless, they cannot undo the global ripple effects. She compares the strategy to a bell that, once rung, cannot be unrung.
In the years to come, world leaders will point to this strategy as proof that U.S. commitment to democracy can vanish. Even if future administrations reverse course, trust will take much longer to rebuild. Citizens in allied countries may no longer believe the U.S. will stand by them.
What comes next after the National Security Strategy
Looking ahead, two main scenarios could unfold. In one, a future president will restore America’s traditional role. That would mean revisiting the strategy, renewing support for NATO, and pushing back against Russia. In that case, Europe might slowly regain trust in the U.S.
In the other scenario, the shift continues. Subsequent leaders may see value in focusing on domestic concerns and realigning foreign policy. If that happens, Europe may accelerate its own defense plans and seek new alliances. Global democracy could face a prolonged period of weakness.
Either way, Mary Trump encourages American voters to act. She insists they can reclaim democracy at home by voting out leaders who stray from democratic principles. Yet she also stresses that voters cannot reverse every consequence of the National Security Strategy. Ultimately, she urges citizens to stay informed and engaged.
Frequently Asked Questions
How does the National Security Strategy affect NATO?
The strategy stops support for Ukraine’s membership in NATO. It also hints at less U.S. involvement in NATO missions, which could weaken the alliance’s deterrence against threats.
Why is Russia happy about the new policy?
Russian leaders see it as an opportunity to expand influence in Europe. They believe a reduced American presence lets them push their own agenda with fewer obstacles.
Can future presidents change the strategy?
Yes. Future administrations can revise or replace the National Security Strategy. However, rebuilding trust with allies may take years, even after policy changes.
What can U.S. voters do about these changes?
Voters can elect leaders who prioritize democracy and alliances. Yet they should also prepare for the long-term effects that cannot be easily undone.