Key Takeaways:
- Legendary filmmaker Ken Burns warns Founding Fathers would fear today’s surge in executive power.
- Trump’s second administration has pushed for more control over budgets and watchdog agencies.
- Burns believes lawmakers gave up too much power, and that alarms the original architects.
- This shift could reshape American democracy and weaken checks and balances.
Founders Fear Executive Power Surge
In a recent CNN “Inside Politics” interview, filmmaker Ken Burns spoke plainly. He said America’s Founding Fathers would be alarmed by today’s executive power. According to Burns, the real worry is not just a forceful president. Instead, it is Congress handing away too much authority. As a result, the balance designed at the start may crumble. Moreover, this shift threatens the checks and balances those early leaders built.
Legislative Branch and Executive Power
The Founders wrote the Constitution to split power. They gave Congress authority over spending. They set up agencies to watch the executive branch. However, recent moves show that lawmakers have yielded that control. They even approved emergency funds without clear limits. In addition, they have trimmed back oversight committees. Therefore, the legislative branch has less say in major decisions. Consequently, the executive power grows unchecked.
How Trump’s Actions Boosted Executive Power
Since his second term began, Trump has acted swiftly. He fired independent watchdogs and inspectors. He argued that budget control belongs to the White House. Meanwhile, he pressed agencies to follow his directives without resistance. For example, Trump sought to redirect funds to border projects. He bypassed regular appropriations rules. As a result, the White House gained more leverage. Ultimately, these steps widened the gap between branches. This trend makes many wonder how far executive power can go.
Why Founders Valued Legislative Checks
Originally, lawmakers held the purse strings. They could approve or deny any federal spending plan. They also could investigate executive missteps. Moreover, senators and representatives could overturn harmful orders. Consequently, presidents had to answer to them. In fact, that system kept any one leader from becoming too strong. It also encouraged debate and compromise. Without these checks, the United States risks sliding toward autocracy.
What Filmmaker Ken Burns Said
Burns has spent decades exploring America’s story on film. In his interview, he praised the Founders for their wisdom. Then he warned that they expected strong executives. However, they never imagined that Congress would surrender so much power. Burns said this would be “the most disturbing thing” if the Founders returned. He believes they would accept a strong president more than a weak legislature. Thus, the real crisis lies in the imbalance that feeds the surge in executive power.
What It Means for Democracy
When one branch outgrows the others, democracy weakens. Citizens may feel that their votes no longer matter. Without proper oversight, mistakes can go unchecked. Laws might change without public debate. Moreover, future presidents could expand these powers further. Therefore, many experts call for new bills to restore balance. They suggest tougher rules on emergency spending. They also urge stronger protections for inspectors and watchdogs. In addition, they want clearer limits on presidential orders. These steps could rein in executive power and revive the checks and balances.
What Could Happen Next
If lawmakers do not act, executive power might grow again. Future presidents could claim more emergency authority. They might cut Congress out of big decisions. On the other hand, public pressure could force a shift. Voters could demand laws to limit unchecked power. Courts could also step in, ruling some orders unconstitutional. Finally, bipartisan coalitions might restore the balance the Founders dreamed of. Either way, the debate over power sharing will shape America’s future.
Frequently Asked Questions
What did Ken Burns say about executive power?
He said the Founding Fathers would be upset that Congress has ceded too much power to the executive branch, rather than upset by a strong president.
How has Congress given away its authority?
Lawmakers have approved funding measures with few checks, cut oversight, and allowed executive agencies more freedom to act without approval.
Why is the surge in executive power concernin
It upsets the balance of checks and balances, risks unchecked decisions, and could weaken democratic accountability over time.
What steps could restore balance between branches?
Proposals include stricter limits on emergency spending, stronger protections for watchdog agencies, and clearer rules on presidential orders.
