Key takeaways
– Michael Cohen says Trump’s second term feels more like a monarchy than a presidency
– He argues Trump uses the court system to punish political opponents
– A new DOJ group called the Weaponization Working Group targets critics
– Letitia James and Adam Schiff now face federal investigations
– Cohen predicts both will be held accountable regardless of actual guilt
The Monarchy Metaphor
Former Trump lawyer Michael Cohen argues that the 2024 election gave Trump power that resembles a king’s rule. He says Americans did not just reelect a president. They handed over authority that exceeds normal limits. According to Cohen, Trump’s court actions show a style of governance that rewards friends and punishes foes.
Cohen says this approach feels more like royal revenge. He believes voters handed Trump near-absolute power. Now Trump is using federal courts to settle political scores. Cohen notes that each new subpoena or court ruling serves to weaken those who opposed him.
Courts as Political Weapons
Cohen points out that Trump does not operate in secret. He uses public announcements and press conferences to highlight each win. Every new headline shows another legal move against critics. This, Cohen argues, amounts to a system where courts serve personal agendas rather than justice.
He argues we are witnessing political revenge on a grand scale. Instead of private whispers, Trump holds public events to spotlight each legal victory. He frames it as punishment for those who stood against him. In Cohen’s view, this marks a dangerous shift in how power works in Washington.
The Weaponization Working Group
A key example of this new strategy is the Department of Justice’s Weaponization Working Group. This unit, led by Trump loyalist Ed Martin, aims to investigate alleged abuses in the justice system. To Cohen, the name alone seems like a parody. However, he warns its mission has serious consequences.
Cohen explains that the group’s first targets include New York Attorney General Letitia James and Senator Adam Schiff. Both officials opposed Trump and pursued him in past investigations. Now they face federal probes over mortgage fraud allegations. Both deny any wrongdoing.
Targets in the Crosshairs
Letitia James won a half-billion-dollar fraud judgment against Trump’s business. Schiff led the impeachment efforts against Trump. Now, federal investigators are digging into their careers and personal lives. Cohen sees this as clear evidence of political retribution in action.
He warns that these investigations serve less to uncover truth and more to settle scores. Cohen says Trump’s allies will push hard to make examples of these high-profile figures. He believes the ultimate goal is to send a warning to anyone who might challenge the former president.
Cohen’s Bold Prediction
Michael Cohen says he prides himself on accurate forecasts. He now predicts that both Letitia James and Adam Schiff will face severe consequences. He believes Trump’s team will use either legal gymnastics or sheer political will to convict them. According to Cohen, this outcome is not driven by guilt but by the fact that they dared to oppose the king.
Cohen warns that in politics, as in history, you do not strike at a king unless you plan to kill him. If you fail, he will strike back. He suggests that James and Schiff missed their chance to unseat Trump and now face the full force of his power.
Implications for American Democracy
These developments raise questions about the separation of powers in the United States. When the executive branch appears to use its influence over the justice system for personal vendettas, it challenges the rule of law. Critics of this approach warn that such tactics can erode public trust in courts and democratic norms.
Supporters of the investigations argue that no one is above the law. They say if these officials broke rules, they deserve scrutiny. However, opponents view the timing and choice of targets as blatantly political. This debate feeds into broader concerns about whether justice can stay impartial when political interests are at play.
A New Era of Political Retribution
Cohen believes we have entered an era where public political revenge becomes routine. He warns that future presidents might adopt similar tactics if they see no pushback. This trend, he argues, could undermine the checks and balances designed to prevent abuse of power.
He also cautions that the public must pay attention. If voters accept the idea of using courts as weapons, they risk normalizing a system where might makes right. Cohen urges Americans to recognize the stakes and demand a return to fair legal processes.
What Happens Next
As the investigations move forward, Letitia James and Adam Schiff will likely challenge the probes in court. Observers will watch closely for signs of political interference. Legal experts expect years of litigation, appeals, and public battles over evidence and procedure.
Meanwhile, Trump and his allies will likely continue to frame these actions as victories. Each new development will serve as proof, in their view, that the system now works in their favor. For Cohen, this is all part of the pattern he has predicted.
Conclusion
Michael Cohen’s warning highlights growing concerns about political power and the use of legal systems as tools of retribution. He urges the public to watch closely. According to him, the fate of Letitia James and Adam Schiff will show whether American democracy can resist the pull of monarchy-style rule. Only time will tell if this bold prediction will prove correct once again.