Key Takeaways:

• Canada’s new defense deal with the EU is being criticized as a PR move rather than a real strategy.
• The deal distracts from Canada’s major defense weaknesses, like outdated equipment and low recruitment.
• Critics say Canada needs to focus on its own military strength, not just sign agreements.
• The deal prioritizes symbolism over solving real security challenges.
• Canada’s real security threats are closer to home, in the Arctic and Pacific, not in Europe.

A Deal for Show, Not Substance

Mark Carney, Canada’s prime minister, has set July 1 as the deadline for a sweeping new defense deal with the European Union. He calls it a bold step for Canada to reclaim its role on the global stage. But beneath the fancy language and diplomatic ceremonies, critics say this deal is more about appearance than action.

The truth is, Canada’s military is in trouble. Its submarines are old and unreliable, its air force is stretched thin, and its navy lacks resources. Recruitment is at an all-time low, and Canada’s Arctic defense infrastructure is almost nonexistent. None of these problems are addressed by the new EU deal.

A Hollow Strategy

The deal is being rushed to coincide with Canada Day and a major NATO summit in Washington. Critics call it a “set piece” designed to look good on paper rather than solve real issues. Carney’s speeches sound strong and visionary, but they lack any real substance.

Canada’s military is not ready to defend itself, let alone support a major alliance. The country’s submarines, air force, and navy are all in poor shape. The Arctic, which is becoming increasingly important geopolitically, is almost entirely neglected.

The Problem with ‘Middle Power’ Mythology

Carney’s government is clinging to the idea of Canada as a “middle power.” This idea worked in the past when the world was more stable, and the U.S. protected its allies. But times have changed. Today’s world is more competitive, and countries need real strength, not just symbolic gestures.

Instead of focusing on Europe, Canada should prioritize its own security challenges. The Arctic is melting, and new powers are competing for influence in the region. The North Pacific is also becoming a hotspot for global power struggles. Yet Canada is acting like a bystander, attending summits but not taking real action.

The Real Work of Defense

If Carney were serious about defense, he’d focus on:

• Modernizing NORAD (North American Aerospace Defense Command).
• Building proper bases in the Arctic.
• Fixing shipbuilding timelines.
• Addressing the recruitment crisis.

Instead, he’s focusing on symbolic gestures, like this EU deal, to distract from the real issues. This deal allows the government to say, “We’re doing something,” while avoiding the hard work of rebuilding Canada’s military.

The EU: Not a Solution

The EU itself is not a strong, united defense force. Its members are divided on strategy, slow to act, and rely heavily on the U.S. for protection. Tying Canada’s fortunes to the EU is not a step forward; it’s a way to avoid the real work of being a serious ally.

The U.S., especially under a potential second Trump administration, won’t be impressed by empty gestures. They want to see real capabilities, not just signed agreements.

A Call for Leadership

Carney’s defenders argue that the deal is a step in the right direction. But a step isn’t enough when Canada is falling behind. The country needs a leader willing to tell the truth: Canada is no longer a meaningful middle power, and its current strategy is outdated and dangerous.

The world won’t be fooled by symbolic deals. Allies and adversaries alike will judge Canada by its ability to field real forces where it matters.

The Road Ahead

Canada needs more than just a defense deal with Europe. It needs a defense reckoning. The country must stop pretending to be a middle power and embrace its role as a nation with three critical frontiers: the Arctic, Atlantic, and Pacific.

Until Canada faces the truth and takes real action, no agreement, summit, or speech will change the fact that the country is not prepared for the challenges ahead. The world is moving forward, and Canada can’t afford to stand still.

The time for illusions is over. It’s time for a real defense strategy, not just another PR stunt.

Key Takeaways:

• Donald Trump claimed he could quickly end the Ukraine war if reelected, relying on his deal-making skills and relationship with Vladimir Putin.
• Trump’s team pressed Ukraine and Russia to negotiate, but both sides refuse to back down.
• Europe has a major stake in the war, and the U.S. must stay involved to protect democracy and stability.
• To end the war, Russia needs to feel the cost of continuing the conflict, and the U.S. and NATO must keep supporting Ukraine.

Trump’s Optimism Meets Reality

Donald Trump’s plan to end the Ukraine war quickly if he becomes president again has hit a wall. Trump believed his deal-making skills and friendship with Russian President Vladimir Putin could resolve the conflict. But the reality is much tougher.

Trump’s team pushed hard for Ukraine and Russia to negotiate. They even scolded Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky publicly, accusing him of not being serious about peace talks. However, both Ukraine and Russia are unwilling to give up.

For Ukraine, the war is about survival. Russia still controls about 20% of Ukrainian land, and the suffering of civilians and destruction of infrastructure cannot be ignored. Ukraine sees the war as a fight for its sovereignty and future.

On the other side, Putin believes the war is existential for Russia. He views Ukraine as part of Russia’s history and destiny, influenced by ideas from his favorite philosopher, Aleksandr Dugin. Putin refuses to accept Ukraine as a separate, independent nation.

Europe’s Stake in the War

The Ukraine war isn’t just about Ukraine and Russia. All of Europe has a lot to lose. The U.S. and NATO have supported Ukraine with weapons, intelligence, and strong diplomacy. This support has surprised both Putin and many Europeans.

During Trump’s first term, he often criticized NATO, making some worry he might reduce U.S. support for Europe. However, the reality is that the U.S. and Europe need each other. If Europe falls into a new era of great power competition and war, it will lose its security and progress. Europeans could face nightmares like those of the 20th century’s two world wars.

Why U.S. Leadership Matters

The U.S. plays a crucial role in Europe’s security. Without American leadership, democratic values and stability in Europe might disappear. Russia’s attempt to change Europe’s borders by force is unacceptable, especially when led by an autocrat like Putin.

The war in Ukraine won’t end unless Russia realizes that continuing the fight isn’t in its best interest. The U.S. and NATO must keep supporting Ukraine while increasing pressure on Russia.

How to End the War

1. Pressure Russia: The U.S. and NATO should make Russia feel isolated and economically weak. More sanctions, including targeting countries that buy Russian oil and gas, could help.

2. Unconventional Warfare: NATO could use creative strategies, like those used in World War II, to undermine Russia’s efforts without escalating the war.

3. Europe’s Role: While Europe can help with peacekeeping and rebuilding Ukraine after the war, it can’t replace the military and intelligence support needed now.

4. U.S. Focus on Europe: Even as the U.S. focuses on competition with China, it can’t abandon Ukraine. A loss in Ukraine would send a weak message to China and other allies.

The Bottom Line

The war in Ukraine is a tough reality. The U.S. and NATO must stay strong and committed. Diplomatic efforts are important, but they can’t come at the cost of Ukraine’s sovereignty. Weakness only invites more aggression.

The U.S. and Europe must stand firm to protect democracy and stability. The stakes are high, but giving up isn’t an option.

Key Takeaways:

• A Veterans Affairs clinic with a $2 billion annual budget is facing serious management issues.
• Broken equipment, dirty storage areas, and expired supplies were found during an audit.
• The clinic, one of the largest VA facilities, may be putting patient health at risk.
• Despite high salaries for VA staff, the clinic has failed to address recurring problems.
• Taxpayers deserve better accountability for their money.

A $2 Billion Clinic with Big Problems

The North Florida/South Georgia Veterans Affairs (VA) health clinic is one of the largest VA facilities in the country. With 611 beds and a $2 billion yearly budget, it should be a top-tier healthcare center. But a recent audit revealed shocking conditions that put patient care at risk. This clinic serves thousands of veterans, but poor management has led to serious issues.

Broken Equipment and Dirty Storage

Auditors found that the clinic lacks proper storage space for broken medical equipment. Instead of fixing or replacing it, staff often leave broken machines in random rooms. These devices are rarely labeled as broken, leading to confusion. Clinic leaders admitted they were unaware of this practice, which shows a clear lack of oversight.

The storage areas for clean supplies are also a mess. Dirty and damaged items were found in areas meant for sterile equipment. This could easily lead to the spread of illnesses among patients and staff. The food storage area was equally troubling, with dirty conditions that could spread bacteria and mold.

Some patient care areas had chipped paint and exposed pipes, creating an environment that is both uncomfortable and potentially unhealthy.

Repeated Issues Ignored**

This isn’t the first time the clinic has faced criticism. In 2022, The Joint Commission, which accredits healthcare facilities, identified several of the same problems. One major issue was the improper storage of oxygen tanks. The clinic kept full and empty tanks together, which could delay emergencies. Storage rooms also had expired medical supplies, which may no longer be safe to use.

These problems were supposed to be fixed years ago, but the audit shows little progress. This lack of action raises questions about how the clinic’s $2 billion budget is being used.

High Salaries, Poor Results**

While the clinic struggles with basic maintenance, VA employees are among the highest-paid federal workers. In 2022, 939 out of 956 federal employees who earned over $400,000 worked for the VA. This includes four dentists. Just a few years ago, in 2019, no VA employee earned that much. The growing salaries contrast sharply with the poor conditions at the clinic.

A Call for Accountability**

Veterans deserve the best healthcare possible, especially after serving their country. Taxpayers entrust the VA with billions of dollars to provide top-quality care. However, the current state of this clinic shows a failure to meet basic standards.

The issues uncovered in the audit are not just about a few broken machines or dirty rooms. They represent a larger problem of poor management and a lack of accountability. Fixing these problems isn’t just about spending more money—it’s about using the money wisely and ensuring that veterans receive the care they deserve.

As taxpayers, we should demand better. Our veterans have earned nothing less.

Key Takeaways:

• Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth threatens to deploy Marines to Los Angeles due to anti-ICE protests.
• Protests have turned violent, targeting ICE and federal agents.
• The move aims to prevent the removal of illegal immigrants with criminal records.
• President Trump’s administration vows to crack down on violence against federal agents.
• Tensions rise in LA as protests escalate, prompting potential military action.

Introduction: Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth has announced a significant move to address escalating violence in Los Angeles. He plans to deploy active-duty Marines if anti-ICE protests continue to turn violent. These protests have targeted Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) facilities and federal law enforcement officers. Hegseth emphasized that the government will not tolerate attacks on federal agents and property.

Who is Pete Hegseth? Pete Hegseth, a prominent figure in the Trump administration, recently made headlines with his strong stance on national security. He serves as the Secretary of Defense, overseeing the nation’s military and defense strategies. His announcement highlights the administration’s tough approach to law enforcement and immigration issues.

Reason Behind the Decision: Hegseth stated that the violent protests aim to disrupt the removal of illegal immigrants with criminal records. He linked these actions to criminal cartels, referring to them as Foreign Terrorist Organizations, thus elevating the situation to a national security threat. Hegseth stressed that the government will not tolerate such disruptions, especially those involving violence against federal personnel.

President Trump’s Stance: The Trump administration has consistently taken a hardline stance against illegal immigration and violence towards law enforcement. Hegseth’s announcement aligns with Trump’s policy of enforcing immigration laws strictly. The administration has previously deployed federal agents to cities experiencing unrest, as seen in Portland and other locations, to maintain order and protect federal property.

Current Situation in LA: Los Angeles has seen heightened tensions with ongoing protests against ICE. Demonstrators are voicing opposition to immigration enforcement actions, particularly targeting ICE facilities. The situation has grown more volatile, with reports of violent clashes between protesters and law enforcement. Hegseth’s announcement is a direct response to these escalating confrontations.

Implications of Military Deployment: Deploying Marines to Los Angeles would be a significant step, marking a rare instance of military involvement in domestic law enforcement. While the move aims to restore order, it also raises concerns about the use of military force in civilian contexts. The community is divided, with some supporting the measure for safety and others fearing it could escalate tensions further.

What’s Next: The situation in Los Angeles remains fluid, with the potential for further escalation if protests continue. Hegseth’s warning serves as a clear signal that the federal government is prepared to take drastic measures. Whether the deployment occurs depends on the protesters’ response and the effectiveness of local law enforcement in managing the unrest.

In conclusion, the potential deployment of Marines to Los Angeles underscores the federal government’s commitment to maintaining order. While the move is controversial, it reflects the administration’s zero-tolerance policy towards violence against federal agents. The situation remains tense, with the nation watching as events unfold in LA.

Key Takeaways:

• Alaska holds vast energy and mineral resources critical to U.S. energy independence.
• Trump’s administration is reversing Biden-era restrictions on resource development.
• These changes could boost Alaska’s economy and strengthen national security.
• Biden’s policies locked up land and blocked projects, harming Alaska’s economy.
• Trump’s approach emphasizes responsible development and job creation.

Alaska’s Vast Resources Ignored by Biden, Embraced by Trump

Alaska is a treasure trove of energy and minerals, playing a vital role in America’s energy independence. However, for years, federal policies treated Alaska more like a national park than a state with immense potential. Under President Trump, this is changing.

Alaska’s Wealth of Resources

Alaska is home to:

• 8.7 billion barrels of oil in the National Petroleum Reserve–Alaska (NPR-A).
• The Prudhoe Bay oil field, the largest in North America.
• The Arctic National Wildlife Refuge (ANWR), which could rival Prudhoe Bay’s reserves.
• Over 70 rare earth element occurrences, plus cobalt, graphite, and lithium—key materials for clean tech and national defense.

These resources are not just numbers on a page; they are strategic assets that could power America’s future.

Biden’s Restrictions Hurt Alaska

Under President Biden, Alaska’s resources were locked away. His administration:

• Canceled seven oil and gas leases in ANWR in 2023.
• Shut down access to 13 million acres of NPR-A, stopping jobs and production.
• Blocked projects like the Ambler Access Road and Graphite One, which could have supported domestic battery production.

These actions left Alaska’s economy struggling and made the U.S. more dependent on foreign supplies, especially China, for critical minerals.

Trump’s Bold Energy Agenda

President Trump’s return to office has brought big changes for Alaska. His administration is:

• Repealing Biden’s restrictions on drilling in NPR-A, restoring access to oil-rich land.
• Supporting projects that could make Alaska a leader in both fossil fuels and renewable energy.

Why This Matters

Interior Secretary Doug Burgum said, “The NPR-A was meant for energy production. We’re restoring balance as Congress intended.” Energy Secretary Chris Wright added, “Alaska can lead in both fossil fuels and renewable energy. Washington should step aside.”

Alaska Governor Mike Dunleavy, who hosted a major energy conference, made it clear: Responsible resource development is not just possible—it’s essential.

Real People, Real Impact

This isn’t just about policies—it’s about people’s lives. When the federal government restricts development:

• Fewer jobs are created.
• Less money flows into local communities.
• More Alaskans leave the state to find work.

These restrictions also harm national energy security at a time when global instability makes energy independence more important than ever.

A Brighter Future for Alaska

Under Trump’s leadership, Alaska is back in the game. The state can once again contribute to America’s energy needs and economic growth.

What’s Next?

Alaska’s future should be built on opportunity, not obstruction. With leaders like Trump and Dunleavy, Alaska can:

• Unlock its vast resources.
• Lead the nation in energy production.
• Secure its place as a cornerstone of America’s energy independence.

The choice is clear: Keep Alaska on the sidelines, or unleash its potential to power the nation. With the right leadership, Alaska can soar.

Key Takeaways:

• The Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) ignored recommendations to reduce office space, wasting taxpayer money.
• Underutilized meeting rooms, a costly fitness center, and excessive office space contributed to the wasteful spending.
• The CPSC even signed leases without proper authority, adding to the financial misuse.

Unused Office Space Costs Taxpayers Millions

The Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) is supposed to keep products safe for consumers. But according to a recent audit, the agency has been wasting taxpayer money on unused office space. Here’s what happened:

Underutilized Meeting Rooms

The CPSC headquarters has multiple meeting rooms that are rarely used. From May 2022 to June 2023, these rooms were reserved for just 51 hours out of a possible 4,860 hours. That’s less than 2% usage!

Three other meeting rooms were left mostly untouched for over three years, starting in March 2020. Additionally, the 12 conference rooms in the headquarters were reserved less than 7% of the time.

A Costly Fitness Center

The CPSC also pays $137,344 a year to lease a fitness center. But only 44 out of 477 employees use it at least once a month. Some employees might be using the facility just to access the restroom instead of working out.

To make matters worse, the CPSC could charge employees to use the fitness center, but taxpayers footed the entire bill instead.

Too Much Office Space

The CPSC owns three buildings in Maryland: its headquarters, a storage facility, and a testing center. But the agency has way more space than it needs. The inspector general found that 28,122 square feet of space in the headquarters is unnecessary.

If the CPSC stopped paying rent on this unused space, taxpayers could save $2.8 million annually. Each CPSC employee currently uses 219 square feet of office space, which is much more than the standard 150 square feet per person.

Ignoring Recommendations

Back in 2019, the General Services Administration (GSA) warned the CPSC that it should reduce its office space by 25,380 square feet. Doing so would save $3.9 million on its next lease. But the CPSC ignored this advice due to “poor internal controls.”

In 2021, three Directors of Facility Services at the CPSC signed leases worth $99 million, even though they had no authority to do so. This added to the financial mess.

A Bigger Problem in Government Spending

The CPSC is not the only federal agency wasting money on office space. Since 2021, the government has spent $4.6 billion on furniture, including items like leather recliners and solar-powered picnic tables. Much of this spending happened during the pandemic when most federal employees were working remotely.

Even after the pandemic, only 6% of federal employees were working in person every day in 2024. Yet, many agencies continue to pay for large offices and unused facilities.

Why This Matters

Government audits are meant to uncover waste and help agencies save money. But when agencies like the CPSC ignore these findings, taxpayer money goes down the drain. This is a clear example of how poor management and lack of accountability can lead to unnecessary spending.

Taxpayers deserve better. It’s time for federal agencies to take responsibility for how they use our money.

If you’re concerned about government waste, you can search federal, state, and local government spending at OpenTheBooks.com.

This article was republished with permission from RealClearInvestigations.

Follow us for more updates on government accountability and taxpayer transparency!