Key Takeaways:
- A Georgia judge has blocked a hand-counting rule for the 2024 election, citing concerns about potential delays and uncertainty.
- The rule was passed by a pro-Trump majority on the state election board and has sparked fears of election subversion.
- Another lawsuit is expected challenging additional election board regulations.
Judge Halts Controversial Hand-Counting Rule
Fulton County Judge Robert McBurney issued a ruling that blocks the implementation of a newly passed rule requiring hand counting of ballots on Election Night for the upcoming 2024 election. The hand-counting rule was passed by a Trump-aligned majority on the Georgia State Election Board, just weeks before early voting began. The judge’s decision was based on concerns about the timing of the rule, which could create delays and logistical issues during an already complex election season.
Concerns About Delays and Election Integrity
Judge McBurney stressed that enforcing this rule so close to the election could result in major disruptions. He noted that the hand count, which would involve more than 7,500 poll workers, many of whom would not have received adequate training, would likely lead to errors and delays in counting. Additionally, handling paper ballots multiple times would increase the risk of inaccuracies. McBurney’s ruling emphasized that this level of disorder could erode public trust in the electoral process, particularly in an election already marred by heightened tension.
The January 6 Insurrection’s Shadow
In his ruling, McBurney drew attention to the lasting impact of the January 6 insurrection, pointing out that the memories of that day still linger. He argued that anything adding further uncertainty to the electoral process, especially in Georgia—a key battleground state—would not serve the public interest. The rule’s late introduction, coupled with the possibility of delayed results, could fuel more election denial and undermine trust in the outcome.
A Blow to Election Deniers
This decision marked a significant defeat for election deniers in Georgia. Earlier the same day, McBurney ruled that county election officials are required to certify election results, another move aimed at ensuring the integrity of the voting process. The blocked hand-count rule was widely seen as a tactic that could have been exploited to delay certification and challenge the legitimacy of the results, especially if the state’s electoral outcome did not favor Donald Trump or his allies.
Other Controversial Rules Under Legal Scrutiny
The hand-counting rule is not the only change pushed by the pro-Trump majority on Georgia’s election board. New regulations requiring county election officials to conduct “reasonable inquiries” before certifying results and granting access to election-related documents have also sparked controversy. These additional changes will face legal challenges in the coming days, with concerns that they could further complicate election administration and pave the way for disputes over results.
Record Turnout in Early Voting
McBurney’s ruling comes at a time of record voter turnout in Georgia. On the first day of early voting, more than 300,000 people cast their ballots, underscoring the importance of clear and efficient election procedures. The decision to block the hand-count rule aims to avoid potential chaos and ensure that voters can have confidence in the electoral process as the state heads into a pivotal election.
Conclusion:
The blocked hand-counting rule is a victory for those advocating for election stability and integrity. As the 2024 election looms, this ruling highlights the continued legal battles over election laws in Georgia and across the country. Another court challenge is set to address additional changes to election certification rules, and the outcome of that case could further shape how Georgia’s election is conducted.
For more information, read the original article on https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2024/10/georgia-judge-blocks-maga-election-subversion-rule/