Key Takeaways:
– Concerns are raised over Kamala Harris’s competency and her chances of winning the presidency.
– Arguments contend that her candidacy does not align with the values encapsulated by the constitution and the Christian faith.
– The shifting dynamic from a productive to a consumer society may contribute to the support she receives.
– An examination of the impact of past presidencies emphasizes the consequential nature of elections.
– The perceived strength of Donald Trump in comparison to Harris advocates for his continued leadership.
A Whiff of Harris’s Potential Presidency
The possibility of Kamala Harris getting anywhere near the presidency has raised numerous concerns among many Americans. Critics argue her communication skills alone would place her in a less favorable position when compared to the common man. It’s a startling reality to confront as we draw near to the election, especially given that polling data suggests Harris’s victory is not so far fetched.
A Step Back in Time
Venturing into the annals of history, 18th, 19th, and 20th-century politics would hardly have had a place for candidates like Harris. Her emergence on the political scene did not follow the usual routes, as she did not run in the primary. The question arises: who facilitated her rise within the national Democrat Party, and what does this mean for the party?
Harris’s Candidacy — A Modern Fairy Tale?
As we grapple with the evolving political scene, the candidacy of Harris is likened to a fairy tale. But in this rendition, the protagonist might prematurely disappear. We are left to hope for a slightly revised ending to this tale, lest the playwright script a cataclysmic finale.
Does Government Love DEI at the Cost of Freedom?
In the pursuit of DEI (Diversity, Equity, Inclusion), we must question if it glosses over individual effort and achievement. Is it in line with our principles of economic freedom where everyone gets the chance to mold their destiny, or is it simply paving the way for a disguised form of racism, dictatorship, and a lack of morals?
A Shift from Producers to Consumers
There is a potential correlation between the transition from a production-based society to a consumer society and the rise of candidates like Harris. Perhaps the absence of productivity has veiled the vision of many, making them more likely to accept such changes. It’s not hard to see when the landscape of Middle America is littered with materialism, leaving little room for self-determinism or resourcefulness.
History Speaks
When we look at the legacies of the presidencies of both Democrat and Republican leaders, we see shared responsibility for the growth of government power. Franklin D. Roosevelt, Dwight Eisenhower, the Kennedy’s, Johnson, and the Bushes, all left their mark, many times muddying the waters, affirming the potential for lasting consequences from every election.
Tragedy Witnesses and Leadership
In challenging times reminiscent of a tragic accident, we observe two types of people — those willing to act, and those who withdraw. Donald Trump, much like the former, displayed resilience even in the face of adversity, encouraging his fellow citizens to do the same.
With the threat of economic inflation looming and a beleaguered global political scene, the candidacy of a person who failed to address critical issues such as border integrity can become a mystery. Contrarily, a candidate like Trump, who has weathered storms, stands as a testament to tested leadership.
In conclusion, the entrusting of the American presidency should not be taken lightly. Every vote cast carries the weight of deciding the future trajectory of the nation. Hence, it is essential that voters are informed, aware and critical when assessing the potential leaders of their beloved country.