Key Takeaways:
- Derek Hunter, a GOP strategist, questions why people should care about the Los Angeles riots.
- He suggests letting liberal cities deal with their own problems due to poor leadership.
- He criticizes Democrats but clarifies it’s not all of them, just those not paying attention.
- Californians’ votes for ineffective leaders cause their suffering, so why help them?
- Democrats might need to face consequences to learn, like children.
- He’s willing to let California handle its issues until they seek federal aid.
Introduction:
Derek Hunter, a GOP strategist and former Daily Caller editor, sparked debate by questioning concern for Los Angeles riots, suggesting liberal cities should manage their crises. His comments highlight frustration with Democratic leadership and the idea of letting cities face the consequences of their governance.
Letting Cities Face the Music
Hunter argues that some Democrats are unreachable, like Terminators, unable to be reasoned with. He believes certain Democrats blindly support policies harming their cities, making it hard for others to care about their plight.
Learning the Hard Way
Hunter compares California Democrats to children who only learn through consequences. After generations of supporting failing policies, he suggests they need to experience the results firsthand. For example, Californians face rebuilding delays due to strict regulations, a consequence of their votes.
A Limit to Letting Go
While Hunter is willing to let California handle its issues until seeking federal aid, he sets boundaries. He acknowledges the state’s struggles but emphasizes personal responsibility in political choices.
Conclusion
Derek Hunter’s comments reflect a broader frustration with political divisions and governance. His approach suggests a tough love strategy, emphasizing personal responsibility and the need for accountability. As the debate continues, the balance between support and self-reliance remains a key issue.