Key takeaways
- Lev Parnas claims Trump’s Epstein ties hide possible crimes
- He uses past court cases as proof of wrongdoing
- Parnas questions why Trump never sued Katie Johnson
- He argues the Justice Department under Bill Barr buried evidence
- The White House rejects all of Parnas’s accusations
A former Trump insider now says that the president may have acted criminally with Jeffrey Epstein. Lev Parnas once helped Trump behind the scenes. However, today he feels deep disgust at Trump’s actions and those who excuse them. Parnas laid out his claims in a detailed online post.
Parnas’s Change of Heart Parnas worked with Trump’s team in the White House. Yet he now speaks against the president. He admits he no longer trusts Trump. Instead, Parnas sees a pattern of behavior that suggests criminal conduct involving underage victims.
Questioning the Media Response Parnas notes that many media figures have tried to downplay the Wall Street Journal report. That story revealed Trump’s personal handwritten letter to Epstein on his birthday. Yet most commentators refuse to call it a crime. Parnas argues that people use the lack of direct proof as an excuse to protect Trump.
Circumstantial Evidence Explained Parnas uses a simple weather analogy. He says that if you hear thunder and find the ground wet, you know it rained. By the same logic, he argues, the many details about Trump and Epstein point to a crime even if no one saw it happen.
Past Court Rulings as Proof Parnas reminds readers of a recent jury decision. In that case, a New York jury found Trump liable for sexual abuse. He tried to overturn that verdict but lost the appeal. According to Parnas, this shows that a legal body already found Trump’s behavior criminal.
The Access Hollywood Moment Parnas also brings up the infamous Access Hollywood recording. In that tape, Trump admitted to grabbing women without consent. Parnas calls that admission proof of a mindset that could enable abuse. He says it goes beyond mere locker room talk.
Katie Johnson’s Lawsuit Parnas then highlights the case of Katie Johnson. She alleged that Trump and Epstein assaulted her when she was thirteen. She brought a lawsuit but dropped it after facing threats. Parnas points out that Trump has sued many people but never sued Katie. He says that means he fears discovery of the truth.
Doubts About the Epstein Investigation Next, Parnas questions the role of the Justice Department under Bill Barr. He claims the department focused on hiding facts instead of seeking justice. Parnas even suggests that Epstein’s arrest may have aimed to silence him rather than punish him.
Who Else Might Be Protected Parnas asks what other people might be shielding Trump and Epstein. He names former officials who worked to end investigations. He urges readers to wonder why these figures shut down probes into the Trump–Epstein relationship.
Parnas’s Personal Perspective Throughout his post, Parnas makes it clear he speaks as a former insider. He also mentions he has seven children, including three daughters. He says that any parent would feel rage and disgust if they knew what he believes Trump did.
The White House Reaction So far, the White House has not responded to Parnas’s detailed allegations. Trump himself has denied wrongdoing at every turn. His team rejects any claim that he ever acted inappropriately with minors or abused his power.
Possible Political Impact Parnas’s remarks may influence voters and pundits. Some may view his insider status as boosting his credibility. Others may dismiss him as an angry ex-associate. Yet his new claims add fresh fuel to debates about Trump’s character.
Legal and Public Opinion Legally, Parnas offers no new direct proof. However, he packages existing facts into a narrative that urges common sense. Public opinion could shift if more people accept his interpretation of the evidence.
Next Steps for Investigators Parnas’s post raises questions journalists might probe next. They could seek more documents about Trump’s letter to Epstein. They might also ask why certain officials intervened when Epstein’s legal troubles began.
Broader Questions of Accountability Beyond Trump, Parnas asks readers to consider how power can shield criminals. He suggests that if a president can evade scrutiny, others can too. He calls on citizens to demand transparency in powerful circles.
Why This Matters This story matters because it touches on abuse, power, and justice. If true, it shows a president using his position to hide crimes. Moreover, it highlights how the media and government can protect the powerful.
How People Can Respond Readers can follow developments in the Epstein cases. They can ask their representatives to review any blocked probes. They can also support journalists who seek more documents about Trump’s ties to Epstein.
Conclusion Lev Parnas’s latest post paints a grim picture of Donald Trump’s relationship with Jeffrey Epstein. He claims that common sense, combined with past court rulings and testimonies, proves Trump acted as a sexual predator. While official responses remain firm denials, Parnas’s insider view keeps the story alive. As investigations continue, many will watch closely to see if more evidence emerges or if these accusations remain unresolved.